Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Motion-Preserving Operations for Wrist Arthritis. Issue 5 (November 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Motion-Preserving Operations for Wrist Arthritis. Issue 5 (November 2020)
- Main Title:
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Motion-Preserving Operations for Wrist Arthritis
- Authors:
- Retrouvey, Helene
Sander, Beate
von Schroeder, Herbert P.
Binhammer, Paul
Baltzer, Heather L. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: The authors conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis to answer the question: Which motion-preserving surgical strategy, (1) four-corner fusion, (2) proximal row carpectomy, or (3) total wrist arthroplasty, used for the treatment of wrist osteoarthritis, is the most cost-effective? Methods: A simulation model was created to model a hypothetical cohort of wrist osteoarthritis patients (mean age, 45 years) presenting with painful wrist and having failed conservative management. Three initial surgical treatment strategies—(1) four-corner fusion, (2) proximal row carpectomy, or (3) total wrist arthroplasty—were compared from a hospital perspective. Outcomes included clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness outcomes (quality-adjusted life-years and cost) over a lifetime. Results: The highest complication rates were seen in the four-corner fusion cohort: 27.1 percent compared to 20.9 percent for total wrist arthroplasty and 17.4 percent for proximal row carpectomy. Secondary surgery was common for all procedures: 87 percent for four-corner fusion, 57 percent for proximal row carpectomy, and 46 percent for total wrist arthroplasty. Proximal row carpectomy generated the highest quality-adjusted life-years (30.5) over the lifetime time horizon, compared to 30.3 quality-adjusted life-years for total wrist arthroplasty and 30.2 quality-adjusted life-years for four-corner fusion. Proximal row carpectomy was the least costly; the mean expected lifetime cost forAbstract : Background: The authors conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis to answer the question: Which motion-preserving surgical strategy, (1) four-corner fusion, (2) proximal row carpectomy, or (3) total wrist arthroplasty, used for the treatment of wrist osteoarthritis, is the most cost-effective? Methods: A simulation model was created to model a hypothetical cohort of wrist osteoarthritis patients (mean age, 45 years) presenting with painful wrist and having failed conservative management. Three initial surgical treatment strategies—(1) four-corner fusion, (2) proximal row carpectomy, or (3) total wrist arthroplasty—were compared from a hospital perspective. Outcomes included clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness outcomes (quality-adjusted life-years and cost) over a lifetime. Results: The highest complication rates were seen in the four-corner fusion cohort: 27.1 percent compared to 20.9 percent for total wrist arthroplasty and 17.4 percent for proximal row carpectomy. Secondary surgery was common for all procedures: 87 percent for four-corner fusion, 57 percent for proximal row carpectomy, and 46 percent for total wrist arthroplasty. Proximal row carpectomy generated the highest quality-adjusted life-years (30.5) over the lifetime time horizon, compared to 30.3 quality-adjusted life-years for total wrist arthroplasty and 30.2 quality-adjusted life-years for four-corner fusion. Proximal row carpectomy was the least costly; the mean expected lifetime cost for patients starting with proximal row carpectomy was $6003, compared to $11, 033 for total wrist arthroplasty and $13, 632 for four-corner fusion. Conclusions: The authors' analysis suggests that proximal row carpectomy was the most cost-effective strategy, regardless of patient and parameter level uncertainties. These are important findings for policy makers and clinicians working within a universal health care system. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Volume 146:Issue 5(2020)
- Journal:
- Plastic and reconstructive surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 146:Issue 5(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 146, Issue 5 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 146
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0146-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-11
- Subjects:
- Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals
617.95205 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007260 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0032-1052
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6528.924000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 15159.xml