Healthy and unhealthy food environments are linked with neighbourhood socio-economic disadvantage: an innovative geospatial approach to understanding food access inequities. Issue 17 (12th December 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hallum, Shirelle H; Hughey, S Morgan; Wende, Marilyn E; Stowe, Ellen W; Kaczynski, Andrew T
• Is Part Of: Public health nutrition. Volume 23:Issue 17(2020)
• Page Start: 3190
• Page End: 3196
• Publication Date: 2020-12-12
• Subjects: Food environment, -- Food inequities, -- Geospatial analysis, -- Social disadvantage; Nutrition -- Periodicals; Nutrition policy -- Periodicals; Public health -- Periodicals; 613.2
• DOI: 10.1017/S1368980020002104
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1368-9800

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: This study examined the separate relationships between socio-economic disadvantage and the density of multiple types of food outlets, and relationships between socio-economic disadvantage and composite food environment indices. Design: Cross-sectional data were analysed using geospatial kernel density techniques. Food outlet data included convenience stores, discount stores, fast-food and fast casual restaurants, and grocery stores. Controlling for urbanicity and race/ethnicity, multivariate linear regression was used to examine the relationships between socio-economic disadvantage and density of food outlets. Setting: This study occurred in a large Southeastern US county containing 255 census block groups with a total population of 474 266, of which 77·1 % was Non-Hispanic White, the median household income was $48 886 and 15·0 % of residents lived below 125 % of the federal poverty line. Participants: The unit of analysis was block groups; all data about neighbourhood socio-economic disadvantage and food outlets were publicly available. Results: As block group socio-economic disadvantage increased, so too did access to all types of food outlets. The total food environment index, calculated as the ratio of unhealthy food outlets to all food outlets, decreased as block group disadvantage increased. Conclusions: Those who reside in more disadvantaged block groups have greater access to both healthy and unhealthy food outlets. The density of unhealthy establishments was greater in more disadvantaged areas; however, because of having greater access to grocery stores, disadvantaged populations have less obesogenic total food environments. Structural changes are needed to reduce access to unhealthy food outlets to ensure environmental injustice and reduce obesity risk.