Comparing Analytical Methods for the Gut Microbiome and Aging: Gut Microbial Communities and Body Weight in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study. (6th February 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparing Analytical Methods for the Gut Microbiome and Aging: Gut Microbial Communities and Body Weight in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study. (6th February 2020)
- Main Title:
- Comparing Analytical Methods for the Gut Microbiome and Aging: Gut Microbial Communities and Body Weight in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study
- Authors:
- Shardell, Michelle
Parimi, Neeta
Langsetmo, Lisa
Tanaka, Toshiko
Jiang, Lingjing
Orwoll, Eric
Shikany, James M
Kado, Deborah M
Cawthon, Peggy M - Editors:
- Masternak, Michal
- Abstract:
- Abstract: Determining the role of gut microbial communities in aging-related phenotypes, including weight loss, is an emerging gerontology research priority. Gut microbiome datasets comprise relative abundances of microbial taxa that necessarily sum to 1; analysis ignoring this feature may produce misleading results. Using data from the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) study ( n = 530; mean [ SD ] age = 84.3 [4.1] years), we assessed 163 genera from stool samples and body weight. We compared conventional analysis, which does not address the sum-to-1 constraint, to compositional analysis, which does. Specifically, we compared elastic net regression (for variable selection) and conventional Bayesian linear regression (BLR) and network analysis to compositional BLR and network analysis; adjusting for past weight, height, and other covariates. Conventional BLR identified Roseburia and Dialister (higher weight) and Coprococcus-1 (lower weight) after multiple comparisons adjustment ( p < .0125); plus Sutterella and Ruminococcus-1 ( p < .05). No conventional network module was associated with weight. Using compositional BLR, Coprococcus-2 and Acidaminococcus were most strongly associated with higher adjusted weight; Coprococcus-1 and Ruminococcus-1 were most strongly associated with lower adjusted weight ( p < .05), but nonsignificant after multiple comparisons adjustment. Two compositional network modules with respective hub taxa Blautia and Faecalibacterium were associatedAbstract: Determining the role of gut microbial communities in aging-related phenotypes, including weight loss, is an emerging gerontology research priority. Gut microbiome datasets comprise relative abundances of microbial taxa that necessarily sum to 1; analysis ignoring this feature may produce misleading results. Using data from the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) study ( n = 530; mean [ SD ] age = 84.3 [4.1] years), we assessed 163 genera from stool samples and body weight. We compared conventional analysis, which does not address the sum-to-1 constraint, to compositional analysis, which does. Specifically, we compared elastic net regression (for variable selection) and conventional Bayesian linear regression (BLR) and network analysis to compositional BLR and network analysis; adjusting for past weight, height, and other covariates. Conventional BLR identified Roseburia and Dialister (higher weight) and Coprococcus-1 (lower weight) after multiple comparisons adjustment ( p < .0125); plus Sutterella and Ruminococcus-1 ( p < .05). No conventional network module was associated with weight. Using compositional BLR, Coprococcus-2 and Acidaminococcus were most strongly associated with higher adjusted weight; Coprococcus-1 and Ruminococcus-1 were most strongly associated with lower adjusted weight ( p < .05), but nonsignificant after multiple comparisons adjustment. Two compositional network modules with respective hub taxa Blautia and Faecalibacterium were associated with adjusted weight ( p < .01). Findings depended on analytical workflow. Compositional analysis is advocated to appropriately handle the sum-to-1 constraint. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journals of gerontology. Volume 75:Number 7(2020)
- Journal:
- Journals of gerontology
- Issue:
- Volume 75:Number 7(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 75, Issue 7 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 75
- Issue:
- 7
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0075-0007-0000
- Page Start:
- 1267
- Page End:
- 1275
- Publication Date:
- 2020-02-06
- Subjects:
- Compositional analysis -- Frailty -- Bayesian regression -- Network analysis
Geriatrics -- Periodicals
Gerontology -- Periodicals
618.97 - Journal URLs:
- https://academic.oup.com/biomedgerontology/ ↗
http://biomed.gerontologyjournals.org/ ↗
http://biomedgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗
http://www.proquest.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/gerona/glaa034 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1079-5006
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4995.099000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 15143.xml