Automated identification of implausible values in growth data from pediatric electronic health records. (26th April 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Daymont, Carrie; Ross, Michelle E; Russell Localio, A; Fiks, Alexander G; Wasserman, Richard C; Grundmeier, Robert W
• Is Part Of: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. Volume 24:Number 6(2017:Nov.)
• Page Start: 1080
• Page End: 1087
• Publication Date: 2017-04-26
• Subjects: growth -- data quality -- research methodology; Medical informatics -- Periodicals; Information Services -- Periodicals; Medical Informatics -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Informatique -- Périodiques; Informatica; Geneeskunde; Informatique médicale; Computer network resources; Electronic journals; 610.285
• DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocx037
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1067-5027

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: Large electronic health record (EHR) datasets are increasingly used to facilitate research on growth, but measurement and recording errors can lead to biased results. We developed and tested an automated method for identifying implausible values in pediatric EHR growth data. Materials and Methods: Using deidentified data from 46 primary care sites, we developed an algorithm to identify weight and height values that should be excluded from analysis, including implausible values and values that were recorded repeatedly without remeasurement. The foundation of the algorithm is a comparison of each measurement, expressed as a standard deviation score, with a weighted moving average of a child's other measurements. We evaluated the performance of the algorithm by (1) comparing its results with the judgment of physician reviewers for a stratified random selection of 400 measurements and (2) evaluating its accuracy in a dataset with simulated errors. Results: Of 2 000 595 growth measurements from 280 610 patients 1 to 21 years old, 3.8% of weight and 4.5% of height values were identified as implausible or excluded for other reasons. The proportion excluded varied widely by primary care site. The automated method had a sensitivity of 97% (95% confidence interval [CI], 94–99%) and a specificity of 90% (95% CI, 85–94%) for identifying implausible values compared to physician judgment, and identified 95% (weight) and 98% (height) of simulated errors. Discussion and Conclusion: This automated, flexible, and validated method for preparing large datasets will facilitate the use of pediatric EHR growth datasets for research.