Electronic problem lists: a thematic analysis of a systematic literature review to identify aspects critical to success. (14th March 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hodge, Chad M; Narus, Scott P
• Is Part Of: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. Volume 25:Number 5(2018)
• Page Start: 603
• Page End: 613
• Publication Date: 2018-03-14
• Subjects: medical records systems -- computerized -- medical records -- problem oriented -- medical records -- problem oriented/standards -- problem list -- thematic analysis -- systematic review; Medical informatics -- Periodicals; Information Services -- Periodicals; Medical Informatics -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Informatique -- Périodiques; Informatica; Geneeskunde; Informatique médicale; Computer network resources; Electronic journals; 610.285
• DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocy011
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1067-5027

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: Problem list data is a driving force for many beneficial clinical tools, yet these data remain underutilized. We performed a systematic literature review, pulling insights from previous research, aggregating insights into themes, and distilling themes into actionable advice. We sought to learn what changes we could make to existing applications, to the clinical workflow, and to clinicians' perceptions that would improve problem list utilization and increase the prevalence of problems data in the electronic medical record. Materials and Methods: We followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to systematically curate a corpus of pertinent articles. We performed a thematic analysis, looking for interesting excerpts and ideas. By aggregating excerpts from many authors, we gained broader, more inclusive insights into what makes a good problem list and what factors are conducive to its success. Results: Analysis led to a list of 7 benefits of using the problem list, 15 aspects critical to problem list success, and knowledge to help inform policy development, such as consensus on what belongs on the problem list, who should maintain the problem list, and when. Conclusions: A list of suggestions is made on ways in which the problem list can be improved to increase utilization by clinicians. There is also a need for standard measurements of the problem list, so that lists can be measured, compared, and discussed with rigor and a common vocabulary.