Application of Trans-Areola Approach for Costal Cartilage Harvest in Asian Rhinoplasty and Comparison with Traditional Approach on Donor-Site Morbidity. (21st January 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zhao, Runlei; Pan, Bailin; Lin, Hengju; Long, Yan; An, Yang; Ke, Qingfang
• Is Part Of: Aesthetic surgery journal. Volume 40:Number 8(2020)
• Page Start: 829
• Page End: 835
• Publication Date: 2020-01-21
• Subjects: Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals; 617.95
• DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjaa012
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1090-820X

Abstract

Abstract: Background: The traditional approach of harvesting costal cartilage through a chest wall incision can result in significant donor-site morbidity and usually causes notable scars in Asian patients. This has become the main concern for Asian females seeking rhinoplasty with autologous costal cartilage. Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the donor-site morbidity of the trans-areola approach for costal cartilage harvest in Asian rhinoplasty and to compare it with the traditional approach. Methods: Patients' records were reviewed to determine whether their rhinoplasties had been performed with either the trans-areola or the traditional approach to costal cartilage harvest. Donor-site morbidity was evaluated 1 year postoperatively via a visual analog scale and the Modified Vancouver Scar Scale. Long-term complications of the trans-areola group were assessed at least 6 months after surgery. Results: There were 26 females in the trans-areola group and 35 females in the traditional group; both groups were of similar age and body mass index range. Compared with the traditional group, the trans-areola group had a significantly longer surgery time and a higher pneumothorax rate (7.7% vs 2.9%) but a significantly better scar quality and a higher overall satisfaction. Long-term outcomes and complications of the trans-areola group included significant scars (2/26, 7.7%), concavity of the breast (1/26, 3.8%), and local chest pain/discomfort (1/26, 3.8%). Conclusions: Compared with the traditional approach to harvesting costal cartilage in Asian rhinoplasty, patients who underwent the trans-areola approach had less overall donor-site morbidity and higher overall satisfaction. We recommend this technique to patients who meet the inclusion criteria as well as those seeking a better cosmetic outcome. Level of Evidence: 4: