Imputation and characterization of uncoded self-harm in major mental illness using machine learning. (24th October 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kumar, Praveen; Nestsiarovich, Anastasiya; Nelson, Stuart J; Kerner, Berit; Perkins, Douglas J; Lambert, Christophe G
• Is Part Of: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. Volume 27:Number 1(2020)
• Page Start: 136
• Page End: 146
• Publication Date: 2019-10-24
• Subjects: self-harm -- suicide -- machine learning -- coding -- electronic health records; Medical informatics -- Periodicals; Information Services -- Periodicals; Medical Informatics -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Informatique -- Périodiques; Informatica; Geneeskunde; Informatique médicale; Computer network resources; Electronic journals; 610.285
• DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocz173
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1067-5027

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: We aimed to impute uncoded self-harm in administrative claims data of individuals with major mental illness (MMI), characterize self-harm incidence, and identify factors associated with coding bias. Materials and Methods: The IBM MarketScan database (2003-2016) was used to analyze visit-level self-harm in 10 120 030 patients with ≥2 MMI codes. Five machine learning (ML) classifiers were tested on a balanced data subset, with XGBoost selected for the full dataset. Classification performance was validated via random data mislabeling and comparison with a clinician-derived "gold standard." The incidence of coded and imputed self-harm was characterized by year, patient age, sex, U.S. state, and MMI diagnosis. Results: Imputation identified 1 592 703 self-harm events vs 83 113 coded events, with areas under the curve >0.99 for the balanced and full datasets, and 83.5% agreement with the gold standard. The overall coded and imputed self-harm incidence were 0.28% and 5.34%, respectively, varied considerably by age and sex, and was highest in individuals with multiple MMI diagnoses. Self-harm undercoding was higher in male than in female individuals and increased with age. Substance abuse, injuries, poisoning, asphyxiation, brain disorders, harmful thoughts, and psychotherapy were the main features used by ML to classify visits. Discussion: Only 1 of 19 self-harm events was coded for individuals with MMI. ML demonstrated excellent performance in recovering self-harm visits. Male individuals and seniors with MMI are particularly vulnerable to self-harm undercoding and may be at risk of not getting appropriate psychiatric care. Conclusions: ML can effectively recover unrecorded self-harm in claims data and inform psychiatric epidemiological and observational studies.