9 A comparison of different genomic prediction methods in the Canadian Landrace swine population. (30th November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ardestani, Siavash Salek; Jafarikia, Mohsen; Sullivan, Brian; Sargolzaei, Mehdi; Miar, Younes
• Is Part Of: Journal of animal science. Volume 98(2020)Supplement 4
• Page Start: 10
• Page End: 10
• Publication Date: 2020-11-30
• Subjects: Bayesian C -- Canadian swine -- GBLUP -- Genomic prediction -- ssGBLUP; Livestock -- Periodicals; Livestock; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 636.005
• DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa278.019
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0021-8812

Abstract

Abstract: Increasing the accuracy of breeding value prediction can lead to more profitability through accelerating genetic progress for economic traits. The objective of this study was to assess the predictive abilities and unbiasedness of best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) and popular genomic prediction methods of BayesC, BayesC(π = 0.99), genomic BLUP (GBLUP), and single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP). Genotypic information (50K and 60K) of 4, 890 performance tested Landrace pigs before February 2019 and 471 validation Landrace pigs that both had phenotypic information on backfat thickness (BFT), average daily gain (ADG), and loin muscle depth (LMD) from two Canadian pig breeding companies (AlphaGene and Alliance Genetics Canada) were used. The de-regressed breeding values (DEBV) were employed in GBLUP and Bayesian methods. A total number of 48, 580 single nucleotide polymorphisms remained after quality control and imputation steps. The prediction accuracies were calculated using the correlation between predicted breeding values before performance test and DEBVs after performance test. All employed genomic prediction methods showed higher prediction accuracies for BFT (50.80–52.68%), ADG (26.61–34.47%), and LMD (18.25–25.08%) compared to BLUP method (BFT = 28.54%, ADG = 16.41%, LMD = 17.15%). The highest prediction accuracies for BFT and ADG were obtained using ssGBLUP method, and for LMD it was obtained using BayesC(π = 0.99) . The BayesC(π = 0.99) showed also the lowest prediction biases across the studied traits (+0.05 for BFT, 0.00 for AGD, and -0.10 for LMD). In conclusion, our results revealed the superiority of ssGBLUP (for BFT and ADG) and BayesC(π = 0.99) (for LMD) over other tested methods in this study. However, the prediction accuracies from the tested genomic prediction methods were not significantly different from each other. Thus, employing these methods can be helpful for accelerating the genetic improvement of BFT, ADG, and LMD in the moderate population size of Canadian Landrace.