0746 Dynamics of Sleep Stage Transitions in Patients with Narcolepsy and Other Hypersomnias. (27th May 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kishi, A; Kitajima, T; Kawai, R; Hirose, M; Iwata, N; Yamamoto, Y
• Is Part Of: Sleep. Volume 43(2020)Supplement 1
• Page Start: A283
• Page End: A284
• Publication Date: 2020-05-27
• Subjects: Sleep -- Physiological aspects -- Periodicals; Sleep disorders -- Periodicals; Sommeil -- Aspect physiologique -- Périodiques; Sommeil, Troubles du -- Périodiques; Sleep disorders; Sleep -- Physiological aspects; Sleep -- physiological aspects; Sleep Wake Disorders; Psychophysiology; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 616.8498
• DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsaa056.742
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0161-8105

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Narcolepsy is a chronic sleep disorder characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness and abnormal REM sleep phenomena. Narcolepsy can be distinguished into type 1 (NT1; with cataplexy) and type 2 (NT2; without cataplexy). It has been reported that sleep stage sequences at sleep-onset as well as sleep-wake dynamics across the night may be useful in the differential diagnosis of hypersomnia. Here we studied dynamic features of sleep stage transitions during whole night sleep in patients with NT1, NT2, and other types of hypersomnia (o-HS). Methods: Twenty patients with NT1, 14 patients with NT2, and 35 patients with o-HS underwent overnight PSG. Transition probabilities between sleep stages (wake, N1, N2, N3, and REM) and survival curves of continuous runs of each sleep stage were compared between groups. Transition-specific survival curves of continuous runs of each sleep stage, dependent on the subsequent stage of the transition, were also compared. Results: The probability of transitions from N1-to-wake was significantly greater in NT1 than in NT2 and o-HS while that from N1-to-N2 was significantly smaller in NT1 than in NT2 and o-HS. The probability of transitions from N2-to-REM was significantly smaller in NT1 than in o-HS. Wake and N1 were significantly more continuous in NT1 than in NT2; specifically, N1 followed by N2 was significantly more continuous in NT1 than in NT2 and o-HS. N2 was significantly less continuous in NT1 and NT2 than in o-HS; this was specifically confirmed for N2 followed by N1/wake. REM sleep was significantly less continuous in NT1 than in NT2 and o-HS; specifically, REM sleep followed by wake was significantly less continuous in NT1 than in o-HS. Continuity of N3 did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusion: Dynamics of sleep stage transitions differed between NT1, NT2, and o-HS. Dynamic features of sleep such as sleep instability, persistency of wake/N1, and REM fragmentation may differentiate NT1 from NT2, while N2 continuity may differentiate narcolepsy from o-HS. The results suggest that sleep transition analysis may be of clinical utility and provide insights into the underlying pathophysiology of hypersomnia and narcolepsy. Support: JSPS KAKENHI (18K17891 to AK).