Predicting length of stay in patients admitted to stroke rehabilitation with severe and moderate levels of functional impairments. Issue 43 (23rd October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: García-Rudolph, Alejandro; Cegarra, Blanca; Opisso, Eloy; Tormos, Josep María; Bernabeu, Montserrat; Saurí, Joan
• Other Names: Khasawneh. Fadi T. section editor.
• Is Part Of: Medicine. Volume 99:Issue 43(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-10-23
• Subjects: inpatients -- length of stay -- regression analysis -- rehabilitation -- socioeconomic status -- stroke; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Périodiques; Geneeskunde; Medicine; Periodicals; Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022423
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-7974

Abstract

Abstract : Abstract: Severe stroke patients are known to be associated with larger rehabilitation length of stay (LOS) but other factors besides severity may be contributing. We aim to identify LOS predictors within a population of mostly severe patients and analyze the impact of socioeconomic situation in functionality at admission. A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted including 172 inpatients admitted to a rehabilitation center between 2007 and 2019. Associations with LOS were examined among 30 potential predictor variables using bivariate correlations. Significantly correlated ( P < .002, Bonferroni adjustment) variables were entered into 9 different multiple linear regression models. No mild participants were included, 63.37% severe and 36.63% moderate. Most significant LOS determinants were: 1) total functional independence measure (FIM) ( P < .001) and hemiparesis ( P = .0108) (adjusted R 2 = 0.24), 2) cognitive FIM ( P = .002) and severity ( P = .001) (adjusted R 2 = 0.22), and 3) home accessibility ( P = .043) and hemiparesis ( P = 0.032) (adjusted R 2 = 0.19). Known LOS predictors (e.g., depression, ataxia) within the full stroke severities were not found significant in our dataset. Socioeconomic situation was found moderately correlated with total FIM (r = −0.32, P < .0001). When stratifying the patients' socioeconomic situation into mild, important, and severe social risk, their respective median total FIM at admission were 61.5, 50, and 41, with significant differences between the mild and important group ( P < .001); also significant differences were found between mild and severe groups ( P < .001). A few of the variables identified in the literature as significant predictors of LOS within the full stroke population were also significant for our dataset (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, FIM, home accessibility) explaining less than 25% of the LOS variance. Most of the 30 analyzed known predictors were not significant (e.g., depression, age, recurrent stroke, ataxia, orientation, verbal communication, etc) suggesting that factors outside functional, socioeconomic, medical, and demographics not included in this study (e.g., rehabilitation sessions intensity) have important influences on LOS for severe patients. Patients at mild social risk obtained significantly higher total FIM at admission than patients at important and severe social risk. The importance of socioeconomic situation has been scarcely studied in the literature in relation to functionality at admission; our results suggest that it requires to be considered. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text