COVID-19 in South Korea: epidemiological and spatiotemporal patterns of the spread and the role of aggressive diagnostic tests in the early phase. (4th August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lee, Whanhee; Hwang, Seung-Sik; Song, Insung; Park, Chaerin; Kim, Honghyok; Song, In-Kyung; Choi, Hayon Michelle; Prifti, Kristi; Kwon, Younggyu; Kim, Jeongheon; Oh, Seuk; Yang, Juyeon; Cha, Mirae; Kim, Yoonhee; Bell, Michelle L; Kim, Ho
• Is Part Of: International journal of epidemiology. Volume 49:Number 4(2020)
• Page Start: 1106
• Page End: 1116
• Publication Date: 2020-08-04
• Subjects: COVID-19 epidemic -- aggressive testing -- epidemiological pattern -- severe-patients-targeted treatment -- South Korea; Epidemiology -- Periodicals; 614.4
• DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyaa119
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0300-5771

Abstract

Abstract: Background: South Korea experienced the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak in the early period; thus data from this country could provide significant implications for global mitigation strategies. This study reports how COVID-19 has spread in South Korea and examines the effects of rapid widespread diagnostic testing on the spread of the disease in the early epidemic phase. Methods: We collected daily data on the number of confirmed cases, tests and deaths due to COVID-19 from 20 January to 13 April 2020. We estimated the spread pattern with a logistic growth model, calculated the daily reproduction number (Rt ) and examined the fatality pattern of COVID-19. Results: From the start date of the epidemic in Korea (18 February 2020), the time to peak and plateau were 15.2 and 25 days, respectively. The initial Rt was 3.9 [95% credible interval (CI) 3.7 to 4.2] and declined to <1 after 2 weeks. The initial epidemic doubling time was 3.8 days (3.4 to 4.2 days). The aggressive testing in the early days of the epidemic was associated with reduction in transmission speed of COVID-19. In addition, as of 13 April, the case fatality rate of COVID-19 in Korea was 2.1%, suggesting a positive effect of the targeted treatment policy for severe patients and medical resources. Conclusions: Our findings provide important information for establishing and revising action plans based on testing strategies and severe patient care systems, needed to address the unprecedented pandemic.