Randomized study defining the optimum target interlesion distance in ablation index-guided atrial fibrillation ablation. Issue 10 (30th July 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hoffmann, Philipp; Diaz Ramirez, Ivan; Baldenhofer, Gerd; Stangl, Karl; Mont, Lluís; Althoff, Till F
• Is Part Of: Europace. Volume 22:Issue 10(2020)
• Page Start: 1480
• Page End: 1486
• Publication Date: 2020-07-30
• Subjects: Atrial fibrillation -- Pulmonary vein isolation -- Ablation index -- Interlesion distance -- Contiguity -- CLOSE protocol; Arrhythmia -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Cardiac pacing -- Periodicals; Catheter ablation -- Periodicals; Heart -- Physiology -- Periodicals; Electrophysiology -- Periodicals; 617.4120645
• DOI: 10.1093/europace/euaa147
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1099-5129

Abstract

Abstract: Aims: While the CLOSE protocol proposes a maximally tolerable interlesion distance (ILD) of 6 mm for ablation index ablation index-guided atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, a target ILD has never been defined. This randomized study sought to establish a target ILD for ablation index-guided AF ablation. Methods and results: Consecutive patients scheduled for first-time pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) were randomly assigned to ablation protocols with a target ILD of 5.0–6.0 mm or 3.0–4.0 mm, with the primary endpoint of first-pass PVI. In compliance with the CLOSE protocol, the maximum tolerated ILD was 6.0 mm in both study protocols. A target ablation index of ≥550 (anterior) or ≥400 (posterior) was defined for the '5–6 mm' protocol and ≥500 (anterior) or ≥350 (posterior) for the '3–4 mm' protocol. The study was terminated early for superiority of the '3–4 mm' protocol. Forty-two consecutive patients were randomized and 84 ipsilateral PV pairs encircled according to the study protocol. First-pass PVI was accomplished in 35.0% of the '5–6 mm' group and 90.9% of the '3–4 mm' group ( P < 0.0001). Median ILD was 5.2 mm in the '5–6 mm' group and 3.6 mm in the '3–4 mm' group ( P < 0.0001). In line with the distinct ablation index targets, median ablation index was lower in the '3–4 mm' group (416 vs. 452, P < 0.0001). While mean procedure time was shorter in the '3–4 mm' group (149 ± 27 vs. 167 ± 33min, P = 0.004), fluoroscopy times did not differ significantly (4.7 ± 2.2 vs. 5.1 ± 1.8 min, P = 0.565). Conclusion: In ablation index-guided AF ablation, an ILD of 3.0–4.0 mm should be targeted rather than 5.0–6.0 mm. Moreover, the lower target ILD may allow for less extensive ablation at each given point. Graphical Abstract: