An Evaluation of Alternative Multiple Testing Methods for Finance Applications. (7th April 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Harvey, Campbell R; Liu, Yan; Saretto, Alessio
• Editors: Pontiff, Jeffrey
• Is Part Of: Review of asset pricing studies. Volume 10:Number 2(2020:Jun.)
• Page Start: 199
• Page End: 248
• Publication Date: 2020-04-07
• Subjects: Capital assets pricing model -- Periodicals; Stocks -- Prices -- Periodicals; Investments -- Valuation -- Periodicals; Finance -- Periodicals; 332.632042
• DOI: 10.1093/rapstu/raaa003
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2045-9939

Abstract

Abstract: In almost every area of empirical finance, researchers confront multiple tests. One high-profile example is the identification of outperforming investment managers, many of whom beat their benchmarks purely by luck. Multiple testing methods are designed to control for luck. Factor selection is another glaring case in which multiple tests are performed, but numerous other applications do not receive as much attention. One important example is a simple regression model testing five variables. In this case, because five variables are tried, a t -statistic of 2.0 is not enough to establish significance. Our paper provides a guide to various multiple testing methods and details a number of applications. We provide simulation evidence on the relative performance of different methods across a variety of testing environments. The goal of our paper is to provide a menu that researchers can choose from to improve inference in financial economics. ( JEL G0, G1, G3, G5, M4, C1)