Primary care provider adherence to an alert for intensification of diabetes blood pressure medications before and after the addition of a "chart closure" hard stop. (27th July 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Primary care provider adherence to an alert for intensification of diabetes blood pressure medications before and after the addition of a "chart closure" hard stop. (27th July 2018)
- Main Title:
- Primary care provider adherence to an alert for intensification of diabetes blood pressure medications before and after the addition of a "chart closure" hard stop
- Authors:
- Ramirez, Magaly
Maranon, Richard
Fu, Jeffery
Chon, Janet S
Chen, Kimberly
Mangione, Carol M
Moreno, Gerardo
Bell, Douglas S - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objective: To evaluate provider responses to a narrowly targeted "Best Practice Advisory" (BPA) alert for the intensification of blood pressure medications for persons with diabetes before and after implementation of a "chart closure" hard stop, which is non-interruptive but demands an action or dismissal before the chart can be closed. Materials and Methods: We designed a BPA that fired alerts within an electronic health record (EHR) system during outpatient encounters for patients with diabetes when they had elevated blood pressures and were not on angiotensin receptor blocking medications. The BPA alerts were implemented in eight primary care practices within UCLA Health. We compared data on provider responses to the alerts before and after implementing a "chart closure" hard stop, and we conducted chart reviews to adjudicate each alert's appropriateness. Results: Providers responded to alerts more often after the "chart closure" hard stop was implemented ( P < .001). Among 284 alert firings over 16 months, we judged 107 (37.7%) to be clinically unnecessary or inappropriate based on chart review. Among the remainder, which represent clear opportunities for treatment, providers ordered the indicated medication more often (41% vs 75%) after the "chart closure" hard stop was implemented ( P = .001). Discussion: The BPA alerts for diabetes and blood pressure control achieved relatively high specificity. The "chart closure" hard stop improved provider attentionAbstract: Objective: To evaluate provider responses to a narrowly targeted "Best Practice Advisory" (BPA) alert for the intensification of blood pressure medications for persons with diabetes before and after implementation of a "chart closure" hard stop, which is non-interruptive but demands an action or dismissal before the chart can be closed. Materials and Methods: We designed a BPA that fired alerts within an electronic health record (EHR) system during outpatient encounters for patients with diabetes when they had elevated blood pressures and were not on angiotensin receptor blocking medications. The BPA alerts were implemented in eight primary care practices within UCLA Health. We compared data on provider responses to the alerts before and after implementing a "chart closure" hard stop, and we conducted chart reviews to adjudicate each alert's appropriateness. Results: Providers responded to alerts more often after the "chart closure" hard stop was implemented ( P < .001). Among 284 alert firings over 16 months, we judged 107 (37.7%) to be clinically unnecessary or inappropriate based on chart review. Among the remainder, which represent clear opportunities for treatment, providers ordered the indicated medication more often (41% vs 75%) after the "chart closure" hard stop was implemented ( P = .001). Discussion: The BPA alerts for diabetes and blood pressure control achieved relatively high specificity. The "chart closure" hard stop improved provider attention to the alerts and was effective at getting patients treated when they needed it. Conclusion: Targeting specific omitted medication classes can produce relatively specific alerts that may reduce alert fatigue, and using a "chart closure" hard stop may prompt providers to take action without excessively disrupting their workflow. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. Volume 25:Number 9(2018)
- Journal:
- Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Issue:
- Volume 25:Number 9(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 25, Issue 9 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 25
- Issue:
- 9
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0025-0009-0000
- Page Start:
- 1167
- Page End:
- 1174
- Publication Date:
- 2018-07-27
- Subjects:
- guideline adherence -- decision support systems -- clinical -- diabetes mellitus -- hypertension -- drug prescriptions
Medical informatics -- Periodicals
Information Services -- Periodicals
Medical Informatics -- Periodicals
Médecine -- Informatique -- Périodiques
Informatica
Geneeskunde
Informatique médicale
Computer network resources
Electronic journals
610.285 - Journal URLs:
- http://jamia.bmj.com/ ↗
http://www.jamia.org ↗
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/tocrender.fcgi?journal=76 ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/10675027 ↗
http://jamia.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/en/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/jamia/ocy073 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1067-5027
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4689.025000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 15085.xml