A full characterization of the supermassive black hole in IRAS 09149–6206. Issue 1 (1st October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Walton, D J; Alston, W N; Kosec, P; Fabian, A C; Gallo, L C; Garcia, J A; Miller, J M; Nardini, E; Reynolds, M T; Ricci, C; Stern, D; Dauser, T; Harrison, F A; Reynolds, C S
• Is Part Of: Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. Volume 499:Issue 1(2020)
• Page Start: 1480
• Page End: 1498
• Publication Date: 2020-10-01
• Subjects: black hole physics -- galaxies: active -- X-rays: individual (IRAS 09149–6206); Astronomy -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 520.5
• DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa2961
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0035-8711

Abstract

ABSTRACT: We present new broad-band X-ray observations of the type-I Seyfert galaxy IRAS 09149–6206, taken in 2018 with XMM–Newton, NuSTAR, and Swift . The source is highly complex, showing a classic 'warm' X-ray absorber, additional absorption from highly ionized iron, strong relativistic reflection from the innermost accretion disc and further reprocessing by more distant material. By combining X-ray timing and spectroscopy, we have been able to fully characterize the supermassive black hole in this system, constraining both its mass and – for the first time – its spin. The mass is primarily determined by X-ray timing constraints on the break frequency seen in the power spectrum, and is found to be log [ M BH /M⊙ ] = 8.0 ± 0.6 (1σ uncertainties). This is in good agreement with previous estimates based on the H α and H β line widths, and implies that IRAS 09149–6206 is radiating at close to (but still below) its Eddington luminosity. The spin is constrained via detailed modelling of the relativistic reflection, and is found to be $a^* = 0.94^{+0.02}_{-0.07}$ (90 per cent confidence), adding IRAS 09149–6206 to the growing list of radio-quiet active galactic nuclei (AGNs) that host rapidly rotating black holes. The outflow velocities of the various absorption components are all relatively modest ( v out ≲ 0.03 c ), implying these are unlikely to drive significant galaxy-scale AGN feedback.