Sexual deception: Coevolution or inescapable exploitation?. Issue 1 (1st February 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lehtonen, Jussi; Whitehead, Michael R.
• Is Part Of: Current zoology. Volume 60:Issue 1(2014)
• Page Start: 52
• Page End: 61
• Publication Date: 2014-02-01
• Subjects: Sexual deception -- Coevolution -- Arms race -- Model -- Mimicry -- Imperfect mimicry; Zoology -- Periodicals; Zoology -- China -- Periodicals; 590.5
• DOI: 10.1093/czoolo/60.1.52
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1674-5507

Abstract

Abstract: Sexual deception involves the mimicry of another species' sexual signals in order to exploit behavioural routines linked to those signals. Known sexually deceptive systems use visual, acoustic or olfactory mimicry to exploit insects for prédation, cleptoparasitism and pollination. It is predicted that where sexual deception inflicts a cost on the receiver, a coevolutìonary arms race could result in the evolution of discriminating receivers and increasingly refined mimicry. We constructed a conceptual model to understand the importance of trade-offs in the coevolution of sexually deceptive mimic and receiver. Four components examined were: the cost of mimicry, the cost to receiver for being fooled, the density of mimics and the relative magnitude of a mimicry-independent component of fitness. The model predicts that the exploitation of non-discriminating receivers by accurate signal mimicry will evolve as an evolutionary stable strategy under a wide range of the parameter space explored. This is due to the difficulty in minimising the costs of being fooled without incurring the cost of falsely rejecting real mating opportunities. In the model, the evolution of deception is impeded when mimicry imposes substantial costs for both sides of the arms race. Olfactory signals that are potentially cheap to produce are therefore likely to be more vulnerable to exploitation than expensive visual ornaments.