Temporal Stability and Prognostic Biomarker Potential of the Prostate Cancer Urine miRNA Transcriptome. (4th June 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jeon, Jouhyun; Olkhov-Mitsel, Ekaterina; Xie, Honglei; Yao, Cindy Q; Zhao, Fang; Jahangiri, Sahar; Cuizon, Carmelle; Scarcello, Seville; Jeyapala, Renu; Watson, John D; Fraser, Michael; Ray, Jessica; Commisso, Kristina; Loblaw, Andrew; Fleshner, Neil E; Bristow, Robert G; Downes, Michelle; Vesprini, Danny; Liu, Stanley; Bapat, Bharati; Boutros, Paul C
• Is Part Of: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Volume 112:Number 3(2020)
• Page Start: 247
• Page End: 255
• Publication Date: 2019-06-04
• Subjects: Cancer -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Research -- Periodicals; 616.994
• DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djz112
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0027-8874

Abstract

Abstract: Background: The development of noninvasive tests for the early detection of aggressive prostate tumors is a major unmet clinical need. miRNAs are promising noninvasive biomarkers: they play essential roles in tumorigenesis, are stable under diverse analytical conditions, and can be detected in body fluids. Methods: We measured the longitudinal stability of 673 miRNAs by collecting serial urine samples from 10 patients with localized prostate cancer. We then measured temporally stable miRNAs in an independent training cohort (n = 99) and created a biomarker predictive of Gleason grade using machine-learning techniques. Finally, we validated this biomarker in an independent validation cohort (n = 40). Results: We found that each individual has a specific urine miRNA fingerprint. These fingerprints are temporally stable and associated with specific biological functions. We identified seven miRNAs that were stable over time within individual patients and integrated them with machine-learning techniques to create a novel biomarker for prostate cancer that overcomes interindividual variability. Our urine biomarker robustly identified high-risk patients and achieved similar accuracy as tissue-based prognostic markers (area under the receiver operating characteristic = 0.72, 95% confidence interval = 0.69 to 0.76 in the training cohort, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.74, 95% confidence interval = 0.55 to 0.92 in the validation cohort). Conclusions: These data highlight the importance of quantifying intra- and intertumoral heterogeneity in biomarker development. This noninvasive biomarker may usefully supplement invasive or expensive radiologic- and tissue-based assays.