Generic Protocols for the Analytical Validation of Next-Generation Sequencing-Based ctDNA Assays: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the BloodPAC's Analytical Variables Working Group. (1st September 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Generic Protocols for the Analytical Validation of Next-Generation Sequencing-Based ctDNA Assays: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the BloodPAC's Analytical Variables Working Group. (1st September 2020)
- Main Title:
- Generic Protocols for the Analytical Validation of Next-Generation Sequencing-Based ctDNA Assays: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the BloodPAC's Analytical Variables Working Group
- Authors:
- Godsey, James H
Silvestro, Angela
Barrett, J Carl
Bramlett, Kelli
Chudova, Darya
Deras, Ina
Dickey, Jennifer
Hicks, James
Johann, Donald J
Leary, Rebecca
Lee, Jerry S H
McMullen, Joe
McShane, Lisa
Nakamura, Katherine
Richardson, Aaron O
Ryder, Matthew
Simmons, John
Tanzella, Kelli
Yee, Laura
Leiman, Lauren C - Abstract:
- Abstract: Liquid biopsy, particularly the analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), has demonstrated considerable promise for numerous clinical intended uses. Successful validation and commercialization of novel ctDNA tests have the potential to improve the outcomes of patients with cancer. The goal of the Blood Profiling Atlas Consortium (BloodPAC) is to accelerate the development and validation of liquid biopsy assays that will be introduced into the clinic. To accomplish this goal, the BloodPAC conducts research in the following areas: Data Collection and Analysis within the BloodPAC Data Commons; Preanalytical Variables; Analytical Variables; Patient Context Variables; and Reimbursement. In this document, the BloodPAC's Analytical Variables Working Group (AV WG) attempts to define a set of generic analytical validation protocols tailored for ctDNA-based Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) assays. Analytical validation of ctDNA assays poses several unique challenges that primarily arise from the fact that very few tumor-derived DNA molecules may be present in circulation relative to the amount of nontumor-derived cell-free DNA (cfDNA). These challenges include the exquisite level of sensitivity and specificity needed to detect ctDNA, the potential for false negatives in detecting these rare molecules, and the increased reliance on contrived samples to attain sufficient ctDNA for analytical validation. By addressing these unique challenges, the BloodPAC hopes to expediteAbstract: Liquid biopsy, particularly the analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), has demonstrated considerable promise for numerous clinical intended uses. Successful validation and commercialization of novel ctDNA tests have the potential to improve the outcomes of patients with cancer. The goal of the Blood Profiling Atlas Consortium (BloodPAC) is to accelerate the development and validation of liquid biopsy assays that will be introduced into the clinic. To accomplish this goal, the BloodPAC conducts research in the following areas: Data Collection and Analysis within the BloodPAC Data Commons; Preanalytical Variables; Analytical Variables; Patient Context Variables; and Reimbursement. In this document, the BloodPAC's Analytical Variables Working Group (AV WG) attempts to define a set of generic analytical validation protocols tailored for ctDNA-based Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) assays. Analytical validation of ctDNA assays poses several unique challenges that primarily arise from the fact that very few tumor-derived DNA molecules may be present in circulation relative to the amount of nontumor-derived cell-free DNA (cfDNA). These challenges include the exquisite level of sensitivity and specificity needed to detect ctDNA, the potential for false negatives in detecting these rare molecules, and the increased reliance on contrived samples to attain sufficient ctDNA for analytical validation. By addressing these unique challenges, the BloodPAC hopes to expedite sponsors' presubmission discussions with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) with the protocols presented herein. By sharing best practices with the broader community, this work may also save the time and capacity of FDA reviewers through increased efficiency. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical chemistry. Volume 66:Number 9(2020)
- Journal:
- Clinical chemistry
- Issue:
- Volume 66:Number 9(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 66, Issue 9 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 66
- Issue:
- 9
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0066-0009-0000
- Page Start:
- 1156
- Page End:
- 1166
- Publication Date:
- 2020-09-01
- Subjects:
- ctDNA -- cfDNA -- NGS -- plasma -- liquid biopsy -- analytical validation
Clinical chemistry -- Periodicals
Pharmaceutical chemistry -- Periodicals
Biochemistry -- Periodicals
Biochimie -- Périodiques
Diagnostics biologiques -- Périodiques
Biochemistry
Clinical chemistry
Pharmaceutical chemistry
Biochemistry
Laboratory Techniques and Procedures
Klinische chemie
Periodicals
616.075605 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
https://academic.oup.com/clinchem ↗
http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/1554929.html ↗
http://www.clinchem.org/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa164 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0009-9147
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 15071.xml