Trabecular bone mineral density correlations using QCT: Central and peripheral human skeleton. (December 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chirvi, Sajal; Pintar, Frank A.; Yoganandan, Narayan; Stemper, Brian; Kleinberger, Michael
• Is Part Of: Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials. Volume 112(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-12
• Subjects: QCT -- Skeletal site BMD variations -- Calcaneus -- Talus -- Distal tibia -- BMD; Biomedical materials -- Periodicals; Biomedical materials -- Mechanical properties -- Periodicals; Biomedical materials; Biomedical materials -- Mechanical properties; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 610.28
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104076
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1751-6161

Abstract

Abstract: Musculoskeletal injuries to the lower leg and foot-ankle joint are associated with external mechanical loads resulting from motor vehicle crashes, under body blasts, falls from height, or sports. As an intrinsic material property, the bone mineral density (BMD) is related to bone strength. The clinically recognized biological sites for BMD evaluation are the hip and spine. The focus of this study was to define the correlation between BMD from standard clinical sites (hip and lumbar spine) compared to BMD from non-standard sites (foot-ankle-distal tibia bones). Twenty-one post-mortem human subjects (PMHS) with mean age, height, and mass of 63 ± 11 years, 179 ± 7 cm, and 86 ± 13 kg, respectively were used for analysis. Clinical BMD software (Mindways Software, Inc.) was used for trabecular BMD quantification using quantitative computed tomography (QCT). In quantification of BMD of the foot-ankle-distal tibia (hind foot), the trabecular BMD of the talus (316 ± 86mg/cc) was highest followed by the distal tibia (238 ± 72 mg/cc) and then calcaneus (147 ± 51 mg/cc). To correlate BMD values from foot bone regions with the central skeleton BMD values within the same PMHS, there were 18 lumbar spine and 12 hip BMDs available. The BMD of the distal tibia correlated best with the hip intertrochanter BMD (R 2 of 0.72). Calcaneus BMD best correlated with the hip femoral neck BMD (R 2 = 0.64). In summary, the hind foot bone BMD values correlated better with the hip as compared to the lumbar spine BMD from the same PMHS. These findings indicate that, in the absence of a direct measure of foot-bone BMD, hip BMD might be a better predictor of injury risk to hind foot rather than lumbar spine BMD, or alternatively, calcaneal trabecular BMD can be used to predict the risk of injury to hip. Further, these relationships between central and peripheral regions can also be implemented in finite element models for improved failure predictions.