Learning curve of double‐guidewire technique by trainees during hands‐on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography training. Issue 12 (23rd June 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wang, Xiangping; Ren, Gui; Xi, Yibin; Luo, Hui; Liang, Shuhui; Wang, Biaoluo; Tao, Qin; Luo, Bing; Qin, Qian; Farrell, James J; Guo, Xuegang; Wu, Kaichun; Pan, Yanglin
• Is Part Of: Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology. Volume 35:Issue 12(2020)
• Page Start: 2176
• Page End: 2183
• Publication Date: 2020-06-23
• Subjects: adverse events -- double‐guidewire technique -- ERCP -- learning curve; Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; Digestive organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Liver -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; Liver Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.33
• DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15120
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0815-9319

Abstract

Abstract: Background and Aims: Double‐guidewire technique (DWT) has been successfully performed by experts in difficult biliary cannulation as an advanced technique. This study aimed to define the learning curve and safety of DWT by trainees during hands‐on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) training. Methods: Patients were eligible for inclusion in the study if the biliary cannulation was difficult and the pancreatic duct was inadvertently cannulated. DWT was performed by two trainees randomly under trainers' guidance. The primary outcome was the success rate of DWT biliary cannulation of trainees. Cumulative sum analysis was used to generate visual learning curves. Results: A total of 60 patients with difficult cannulation were enrolled. The main indications for ERCP were common bile duct stones (65%) and biliary stricture (31.7%). The learning curve analysis showed that to achieve a 70% rate of successful DWT, 12 procedures were needed for trainee A and 15 for trainee B. Higher targeted success rate of DWT could be achieved if the number of DWT procedures increased. Compared with the early stage of learning DWT (case 1 to 15 for each trainee), trainees had significantly higher DWT success rate in the late stage (36.7% [11/30] vs 80% [24/30], P = 0.001). The final success rate of cannulation was 98.3% (59/60). The overall rate of post‐ERCP pancreatitis and adverse events was 6.7% (4/60) and 8.3% (5/60), respectively. Conclusions: Double‐guidewire technique was safely performed by two novel trainees during hands‐on ERCP training. Fifteen procedures may be enough for trainees to achieve the competency of performing DWT. (Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT03707613).