Impacts of genesurance considerations on genetic counselors' practice and attitudes. Issue 6 (20th May 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Thoreson, Emily; Murphy, Lauren; Lemons, Jennifer; Farach, Laura; Wilson, Kate; Woodson, Ashley; Wagner, Chelsea
• Is Part Of: Journal of genetic counseling. Volume 29:Issue 6(2020)
• Page Start: 1210
• Page End: 1220
• Publication Date: 2020-05-20
• Subjects: billing issues -- genesurance -- genetic counseling -- genetic counselor workflow -- genetic testing -- insurance issues; Genetic counseling -- Periodicals; 616.042
• DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1291
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1059-7700

Abstract

Abstract: Genesurance counseling has been identified as an integral part of many genetic counseling sessions, but little is known about the workflow impacts and genetic counselor perceptions of genesurance‐related tasks. In this study, we aimed to characterize how insurance and billing considerations for genetic testing are being incorporated into genetic counselors' practice in the United States, as well as describe current attitudes and challenges associated with their integration. An electronic survey was sent by email to members of the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC). A total of 325 American Board of Genetic Counselors‐certified genetic counselors who provide direct patient care in the United States for at least 50% of their time were included in data analysis. Results showed that the frequency and timing of various insurance‐ and billing‐related tasks were not consistent among respondents, even those practicing in similar settings. Inadequate training to complete tasks was reported by 64% of respondents, and 47% reported a lack of resources from their employer and/or institution to complete genesurance tasks. Additionally, only 38% of respondents agreed that insurance‐ and billing‐related tasks were within the scope of the genetic counseling practice, and there was little consensus on who respondents believe is the most appropriate person to complete these tasks. When asked how genesurance considerations affected job satisfaction, 85% of respondents reported a negative impact. This study found an inconsistent genesurance workflow among genetic counselors practicing in the United States, a lack of consensus on who should be responsible for genesurance tasks, several challenges associated with completing these tasks, and identifies genesurance considerations as potential risk factors for genetic counselor burnout.