Loop Drainage Is Noninferior to Traditional Incision and Drainage of Cutaneous Abscesses in the Emergency Department. (14th May 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Loop Drainage Is Noninferior to Traditional Incision and Drainage of Cutaneous Abscesses in the Emergency Department. (14th May 2020)
- Main Title:
- Loop Drainage Is Noninferior to Traditional Incision and Drainage of Cutaneous Abscesses in the Emergency Department
- Authors:
- Schechter‐Perkins, Elissa M.
Dwyer, Kristin H.
Amin, Anish
Tyler, Matthew D.
Liu, James
Nelson, Kerrie P.
Mitchell, Patricia M. - Editors:
- Kuehl, Damon R.
- Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: There is limited research on loop drainage (LD) compared to incision and drainage (I&D) for treatment of cutaneous abscesses. We investigated whether LD was noninferior to I&D for abscess resolution and whether there was any difference in repeat ED visits or complication rates between these techniques. Methods: We performed a prospective randomized controlled trial, using a convenience sample at an urban academic emergency department (ED). Subjects over 18 years who presented for first‐time management of an abscess were eligible. Patients requiring specialist drainage or hospital admission or had previous treatment for the abscess were excluded. Enrolled subjects were seen 2 weeks after treatment for blinded reevaluation of abscess resolution, and the electronic medical record was reviewed for return ED visits/abscess complications. Results: Of 2, 889 patients screened, 238 subjects consented and were randomized to LD or I&D. Abscess resolution was achieved in 53/65 (81.5%) of patients in the I&D arm, compared to 66/75 (88%) in the LD arm. Fewer patients in the LD group compared to the I&D group returned to the ED for abscess‐related management during the following 14 days (37.3% vs 67.1%, p = 0.002). Among returning subjects, there was a significant difference in mean visits per subject between LD and I&D groups (0.5 vs. 1.2, p = 0.001). There were fewer complications among LD than I&D subjects (9.3% vs. 24.6%, p = 0.01). Conclusion: Our study providesAbstract: Background: There is limited research on loop drainage (LD) compared to incision and drainage (I&D) for treatment of cutaneous abscesses. We investigated whether LD was noninferior to I&D for abscess resolution and whether there was any difference in repeat ED visits or complication rates between these techniques. Methods: We performed a prospective randomized controlled trial, using a convenience sample at an urban academic emergency department (ED). Subjects over 18 years who presented for first‐time management of an abscess were eligible. Patients requiring specialist drainage or hospital admission or had previous treatment for the abscess were excluded. Enrolled subjects were seen 2 weeks after treatment for blinded reevaluation of abscess resolution, and the electronic medical record was reviewed for return ED visits/abscess complications. Results: Of 2, 889 patients screened, 238 subjects consented and were randomized to LD or I&D. Abscess resolution was achieved in 53/65 (81.5%) of patients in the I&D arm, compared to 66/75 (88%) in the LD arm. Fewer patients in the LD group compared to the I&D group returned to the ED for abscess‐related management during the following 14 days (37.3% vs 67.1%, p = 0.002). Among returning subjects, there was a significant difference in mean visits per subject between LD and I&D groups (0.5 vs. 1.2, p = 0.001). There were fewer complications among LD than I&D subjects (9.3% vs. 24.6%, p = 0.01). Conclusion: Our study provides evidence that LD is noninferior to I&D in achieving complete abscess resolution at 14 days and is associated with fewer return ED visits and fewer complications. This makes it an attractive alternative treatment option for abscesses. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Academic emergency medicine. Volume 27:Number 11(2020)
- Journal:
- Academic emergency medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 27:Number 11(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 27, Issue 11 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 27
- Issue:
- 11
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0027-0011-0000
- Page Start:
- 1150
- Page End:
- 1157
- Publication Date:
- 2020-05-14
- Subjects:
- Emergency medicine -- Periodicals
616.02505 - Journal URLs:
- https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15532712 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/acem.13981 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1069-6563
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0570.511250
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 15056.xml