Australia and the Abortive Convention on Territorial Asylum: A Case Study of a Cul de Sac in International Refugee and Human Rights Law. (27th March 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Taylor, Savitri; Neumann, Klaus
• Is Part Of: International journal of refugee law. Volume 32:Number 1(2020:Feb.)
• Page Start: 86
• Page End: 112
• Publication Date: 2020-03-27
• Subjects: Refugees -- Legal status, laws, etc -- Periodicals; 342.083
• DOI: 10.1093/ijrl/eeaa006
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0953-8186

Abstract

Abstract: Focusing on the period from the adoption of the 1967 Declaration on Territorial Asylum to the 1977 Conference of Plenipotentiaries on Territorial Asylum in Geneva, this article examines attempts to arrive at an international treaty on territorial asylum. Charting the trajectory of the drafting process, it shows how the ambition of international lawyers and UNHCR to go beyond article 14 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the 1967 Declaration was eventually thwarted. Australia played a significant role at the 1977 conference and particular attention is paid to the development of its position. The article argues that the discussions over the proposed convention on territorial asylum were symptomatic of States' unwillingness to countenance a right to asylum, and their concomitant willingness to extend the principle of non-refoulement .