Cranky comments: detecting clinical decision support malfunctions through free-text override reasons. (26th December 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Cranky comments: detecting clinical decision support malfunctions through free-text override reasons. (26th December 2018)
- Main Title:
- Cranky comments: detecting clinical decision support malfunctions through free-text override reasons
- Authors:
- Aaron, Skye
McEvoy, Dustin S
Ray, Soumi
Hickman, Thu-Trang T
Wright, Adam - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Rule-base clinical decision support alerts are known to malfunction, but tools for discovering malfunctions are limited. Objective: Investigate whether user override comments can be used to discover malfunctions. Methods: We manually classified all rules in our database with at least 10 override comments into 3 categories based on a sample of override comments: "broken, " "not broken, but could be improved, " and "not broken." We used 3 methods (frequency of comments, cranky word list heuristic, and a Naïve Bayes classifier trained on a sample of comments) to automatically rank rules based on features of their override comments. We evaluated each ranking using the manual classification as truth. Results: Of the rules investigated, 62 were broken, 13 could be improved, and the remaining 45 were not broken. Frequency of comments performed worse than a random ranking, with precision at 20 of 8 and AUC = 0.487. The cranky comments heuristic performed better with precision at 20 of 16 and AUC = 0.723. The Naïve Bayes classifier had precision at 20 of 17 and AUC = 0.738. Discussion: Override comments uncovered malfunctions in 26% of all rules active in our system. This is a lower bound on total malfunctions and much higher than expected. Even for low-resource organizations, reviewing comments identified by the cranky word list heuristic may be an effective and feasible way of finding broken alerts. Conclusion: Override comments are a rich data source forAbstract: Background: Rule-base clinical decision support alerts are known to malfunction, but tools for discovering malfunctions are limited. Objective: Investigate whether user override comments can be used to discover malfunctions. Methods: We manually classified all rules in our database with at least 10 override comments into 3 categories based on a sample of override comments: "broken, " "not broken, but could be improved, " and "not broken." We used 3 methods (frequency of comments, cranky word list heuristic, and a Naïve Bayes classifier trained on a sample of comments) to automatically rank rules based on features of their override comments. We evaluated each ranking using the manual classification as truth. Results: Of the rules investigated, 62 were broken, 13 could be improved, and the remaining 45 were not broken. Frequency of comments performed worse than a random ranking, with precision at 20 of 8 and AUC = 0.487. The cranky comments heuristic performed better with precision at 20 of 16 and AUC = 0.723. The Naïve Bayes classifier had precision at 20 of 17 and AUC = 0.738. Discussion: Override comments uncovered malfunctions in 26% of all rules active in our system. This is a lower bound on total malfunctions and much higher than expected. Even for low-resource organizations, reviewing comments identified by the cranky word list heuristic may be an effective and feasible way of finding broken alerts. Conclusion: Override comments are a rich data source for finding alerts that are broken or could be improved. If possible, we recommend monitoring all override comments on a regular basis. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. Volume 26:Number 1(2019)
- Journal:
- Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Issue:
- Volume 26:Number 1(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 26, Issue 1 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 26
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0026-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 37
- Page End:
- 43
- Publication Date:
- 2018-12-26
- Subjects:
- clinical decision support -- electronic health records -- alerts -- override reasons -- sentiment analysis
Medical informatics -- Periodicals
Information Services -- Periodicals
Medical Informatics -- Periodicals
Médecine -- Informatique -- Périodiques
Informatica
Geneeskunde
Informatique médicale
Computer network resources
Electronic journals
610.285 - Journal URLs:
- http://jamia.bmj.com/ ↗
http://www.jamia.org ↗
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/tocrender.fcgi?journal=76 ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/10675027 ↗
http://jamia.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/en/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/jamia/ocy139 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1067-5027
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4689.025000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 15060.xml