Ceftazidime, Carbapenems, or Piperacillin-tazobactam as Single Definitive Therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bloodstream Infection: A Multisite Retrospective Study. (17th July 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Ceftazidime, Carbapenems, or Piperacillin-tazobactam as Single Definitive Therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bloodstream Infection: A Multisite Retrospective Study. (17th July 2019)
- Main Title:
- Ceftazidime, Carbapenems, or Piperacillin-tazobactam as Single Definitive Therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bloodstream Infection: A Multisite Retrospective Study
- Authors:
- Babich, Tanya
Naucler, Pontus
Valik, John Karlsson
Giske, Christian G
Benito, Natividad
Cardona, Ruben
Rivera, Alba
Pulcini, Celine
Abdel Fattah, Manal
Haquin, Justine
Macgowan, Alasdair
Grier, Sally
Gibbs, Julie
Chazan, Bibiana
Yanovskay, Anna
Ben Ami, Ronen
Landes, Michal
Nesher, Lior
Zaidman-Shimshovitz, Adi
McCarthy, Kate
Paterson, David L
Tacconelli, Evelina
Buhl, Michael
Mauer, Susanna
Rodriguez-Bano, Jesus
Morales, Isabel
Oliver, Antonio
Ruiz De Gopegui, Enrique
Cano, Angela
Machuca, Isabel
Gozalo-Marguello, Monica
Martinez Martinez, Luis
Gonzalez-Barbera, Eva M
Alfaro, Iris Gomez
Salavert, Miguel
Beovic, Bojana
Saje, Andreja
Mueller-Premru, Manica
Pagani, Leonardo
Vitrat, Virginie
Kofteridis, Diamantis
Zacharioudaki, Maria
Maraki, Sofia
Weissman, Yulia
Paul, Mical
Dickstein, Yaakov
Leibovici, Leonard
Yahav, Dafna
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: The optimal antibiotic regimen for Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia is controversial. Although β-lactam monotherapy is common, data to guide the choice between antibiotics are scarce. We aimed to compare ceftazidime, carbapenems, and piperacillin-tazobactam as definitive monotherapy. Methods: A multinational retrospective study (9 countries, 25 centers) including 767 hospitalized patients with P. aeruginosa bacteremia treated with β-lactam monotherapy during 2009–2015. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Univariate and multivariate, including propensity-adjusted, analyses were conducted introducing monotherapy type as an independent variable. Results: Thirty-day mortality was 37/213 (17.4%), 42/210 (20%), and 55/344 (16%) in the ceftazidime, carbapenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam groups, respectively. Type of monotherapy was not significantly associated with mortality in either univariate, multivariate, or propensity-adjusted analyses (odds ratio [OR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52–2.46, for ceftazidime; OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.67–2.51, for piperacillin-tazobactam, with carbapenems as reference in propensity adjusted multivariate analysis; 542 patients). No significant difference between antibiotics was demonstrated for clinical failure, microbiological failure, or adverse events. Isolation of P. aeruginosa with new resistance to antipseudomonal drugs was significantly more frequent with carbapenems (36/206 [17.5%]) versusAbstract: Background: The optimal antibiotic regimen for Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia is controversial. Although β-lactam monotherapy is common, data to guide the choice between antibiotics are scarce. We aimed to compare ceftazidime, carbapenems, and piperacillin-tazobactam as definitive monotherapy. Methods: A multinational retrospective study (9 countries, 25 centers) including 767 hospitalized patients with P. aeruginosa bacteremia treated with β-lactam monotherapy during 2009–2015. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Univariate and multivariate, including propensity-adjusted, analyses were conducted introducing monotherapy type as an independent variable. Results: Thirty-day mortality was 37/213 (17.4%), 42/210 (20%), and 55/344 (16%) in the ceftazidime, carbapenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam groups, respectively. Type of monotherapy was not significantly associated with mortality in either univariate, multivariate, or propensity-adjusted analyses (odds ratio [OR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52–2.46, for ceftazidime; OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.67–2.51, for piperacillin-tazobactam, with carbapenems as reference in propensity adjusted multivariate analysis; 542 patients). No significant difference between antibiotics was demonstrated for clinical failure, microbiological failure, or adverse events. Isolation of P. aeruginosa with new resistance to antipseudomonal drugs was significantly more frequent with carbapenems (36/206 [17.5%]) versus ceftazidime (25/201 [12.4%]) and piperacillin-tazobactam (28/332 [8.4%] ( P = .007). Conclusions: No significant difference in mortality, clinical, and microbiological outcomes or adverse events was demonstrated between ceftazidime, carbapenems, and piperacillin-tazobactam as definitive treatment of P. aeruginosa bacteremia. Higher rates of resistant P. aeruginosa after patients were treated with carbapenems, along with the general preference for carbapenem-sparing regimens, suggests using ceftazidime or piperacillin-tazobactam for treating susceptible infection. Abstract : There is no consensus on optimal therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia. In this large retrospective cohort, no difference in clinical outcomes was demonstrated between ceftazidime, piperacillin-tazobactam, and carbapenems. Carbapenem-sparing regimens can be safely used to treat Pseudomonas bacteremia. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical infectious diseases. Volume 70:Number 11(2020)
- Journal:
- Clinical infectious diseases
- Issue:
- Volume 70:Number 11(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 70, Issue 11 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 70
- Issue:
- 11
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0070-0011-0000
- Page Start:
- 2270
- Page End:
- 2280
- Publication Date:
- 2019-07-17
- Subjects:
- Pseudomonas -- bacteremia -- beta-lactam -- monotherapy
Communicable diseases -- Periodicals
616.905 - Journal URLs:
- http://cid.oxfordjournals.org ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/CID/journal ↗
http://www.jstor.org/journals/10584838.html ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/cid/ciz668 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1058-4838
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3286.293860
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 15057.xml