The Strange History of the Right to Bear Arms in the French Revolution. Issue 2 (30th July 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Shusterman, Noah
• Is Part Of: Journal of social history. Volume 54:Issue 2(2020)
• Page Start: 453
• Page End: 479
• Publication Date: 2019-07-30
• Subjects: Social history -- Periodicals; 306.09
• DOI: 10.1093/jsh/shz029
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-4529

Abstract

Abstract: French Revolutionaries shared many of the same beliefs as their American counterparts about the relationship between citizenship and bearing arms. Both nations' leaders viewed standing armies as a threat to freedom, and both nations required militia participation from a portion of the citizenry. Yet the right to bear arms is a legacy only of the American Revolution. The right to bear arms came up several times in debates in France's National Assembly. The deputies never approved that right, but they never denied it either. During the first years of the Revolution, the leading politicians were wary of arming poor citizens, a concern that was in tension with the egalitarian language of the Declaration of the Rights of Man. Moreover, militias thrived during the early years of the French Revolution and became instruments—albeit unstable ones—for maintaining a social domination that played out along class lines. In response to the contradictions in their positions, French revolutionary leaders remained silent on the issue. In France as in the United States, the question of whether or not there was a right to bear arms was less important than the question of who had the right to bear arms.