Comparison of decoding resolution of standard and high-density electrocorticogram electrodes. (9th February 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison of decoding resolution of standard and high-density electrocorticogram electrodes. (9th February 2016)
- Main Title:
- Comparison of decoding resolution of standard and high-density electrocorticogram electrodes
- Authors:
- Wang, Po T
King, Christine E
McCrimmon, Colin M
Lin, Jack J
Sazgar, Mona
Hsu, Frank P K
Shaw, Susan J
Millet, David E
Chui, Luis A
Liu, Charles Y
Do, An H
Nenadic, Zoran - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objective . Electrocorticography (ECoG)-based brain–computer interface (BCI) is a promising platform for controlling arm prostheses. To restore functional independence, a BCI must be able to control arm prostheses along at least six degrees-of-freedoms (DOFs). Prior studies suggest that standard ECoG grids may be insufficient to decode multi-DOF arm movements. This study compared the ability of standard and high-density (HD) ECoG grids to decode the presence/absence of six elementary arm movements and the type of movement performed. Approach . Three subjects implanted with standard grids (4 mm diameter, 10 mm spacing) and three with HD grids (2 mm diameter, 4 mm spacing) had ECoG signals recorded while performing the following movements: (1) pincer grasp/release, (2) wrist flexion/extension, (3) pronation/supination, (4) elbow flexion/extension, (5) shoulder internal/external rotation, and (6) shoulder forward flexion/extension. Data from the primary motor cortex were used to train a state decoder to detect the presence/absence of movement, and a six-class decoder to distinguish between these movements. Main results . The average performances of the state decoders trained on HD ECoG data were superior ( p = 3.05 × 10 −5 ) to those of their standard grid counterparts across all combinations of the μ, β, low- γ, and high- γ frequency bands. The average best decoding error for HD grids was 2.6%, compared to 8.5% of standard grids (chance 50%). The movement decodersAbstract: Objective . Electrocorticography (ECoG)-based brain–computer interface (BCI) is a promising platform for controlling arm prostheses. To restore functional independence, a BCI must be able to control arm prostheses along at least six degrees-of-freedoms (DOFs). Prior studies suggest that standard ECoG grids may be insufficient to decode multi-DOF arm movements. This study compared the ability of standard and high-density (HD) ECoG grids to decode the presence/absence of six elementary arm movements and the type of movement performed. Approach . Three subjects implanted with standard grids (4 mm diameter, 10 mm spacing) and three with HD grids (2 mm diameter, 4 mm spacing) had ECoG signals recorded while performing the following movements: (1) pincer grasp/release, (2) wrist flexion/extension, (3) pronation/supination, (4) elbow flexion/extension, (5) shoulder internal/external rotation, and (6) shoulder forward flexion/extension. Data from the primary motor cortex were used to train a state decoder to detect the presence/absence of movement, and a six-class decoder to distinguish between these movements. Main results . The average performances of the state decoders trained on HD ECoG data were superior ( p = 3.05 × 10 −5 ) to those of their standard grid counterparts across all combinations of the μ, β, low- γ, and high- γ frequency bands. The average best decoding error for HD grids was 2.6%, compared to 8.5% of standard grids (chance 50%). The movement decoders trained on HD ECoG data were superior ( p = 3.05 × 10 −5 ) to those based on standard ECoG across all band combinations. The average best decoding errors of 11.9% and 33.1% were obtained for HD and standard grids, respectively (chance error 83.3%). These improvements can be attributed to higher electrode density and signal quality of HD grids. Significance . Commonly used ECoG grids are inadequate for multi-DOF BCI arm prostheses. The performance gains by HD grids may eventually lead to independence-restoring BCI arm prosthesis. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of neural engineering. Volume 13:Number 2(2016:Apr.)
- Journal:
- Journal of neural engineering
- Issue:
- Volume 13:Number 2(2016:Apr.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 13, Issue 2 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 13
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0013-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2016-02-09
- Subjects:
- brain computer interface -- electrocorticogram -- high density electrocorticogram -- upper extremity -- arm -- classification
Neurosciences -- Periodicals
Biomedical engineering -- Periodicals
612.8 - Journal URLs:
- http://iopscience.iop.org/1741-2552/ ↗
http://ioppublishing.org/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1088/1741-2560/13/2/026016 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1741-2560
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 15043.xml