Faculty perceptions of student incivility in dental hygiene education. Issue 11 (6th July 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: McCarthy, Jennifer L.; Giblin‐Scanlon, Lori; Perry, Kristeen R.; Boyd, Linda D.; Vineyard, Jared
• Is Part Of: Journal of dental education. Volume 84:Issue 11(2020)
• Page Start: 1192
• Page End: 1201
• Publication Date: 2020-07-06
• Subjects: dental hygiene education -- dental hygiene faculty -- student incivility -- uncivil classroom behavior; Dentistry -- Study and teaching -- Periodicals; Dentistry -- Study and teaching; Education, Dental; Dentisterie -- Étude et enseignement -- Périodiques; Tandheelkunde; Onderwijs; Periodicals; Periodical; Electronic journals; 617.6007
• DOI: 10.1002/jdd.12263
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-0337

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose/objective: Conflict and discourtesy between college students and faculty have become increasingly common in higher education. Fallout from uncivil student encounters can have numerous effects on educators' overall health and has been shown to negatively impact learning environments. This research assessed the severity and frequency of student incivility in dental hygiene education and explored the relationship uncivil behavior has on faculty feelings of confidence, career satisfaction, and longevity. Methods: Cross‐sectional survey research was conducted among dental hygiene educators (n = 601) in the United States and Canada using purposive and snowball sampling. The survey (47‐item) was developed based on the literature and validated prior to administration. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to assess the relationship between variables and mean item category scores and thematic analysis was used to identify themes for open‐ended questions. Results: Survey completion rate was 78% (n = 469). Behaviors ranked mildly uncivil, such as eating/drinking in class, occurred more frequently, and incivility had less impact on faculty confidence with increased age (r = ‐.19; P ≤ 0.01). The level of severity of behaviors did not impact educators; however, how often certain behaviors occurred had some effect. Contemptuous behaviors, such as using a disrespectful/sarcastic tone (r = .34, .32, .31; P ≤ 0.01), had the most impact. Conclusion: This study determined student incivility exists within dental hygiene education. Day‐to‐day, minor uncivil behaviors seemingly take a greater emotional toll than occasional, highly uncivil encounter. Understanding how faculty perceive these behaviors may influence development of management strategies, fostering a sense of career satisfaction for educators.