Physiologically‐Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Predict the Clinical Efficacy of the Coadministration of Lopinavir and Ritonavir against SARS‐CoV‐2. Issue 6 (6th October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Thakur, Aarzoo; Tan, Shawn Pei Feng; Chan, James Chun Yip
• Is Part Of: Clinical pharmacology & therapeutics. Volume 108:Issue 6(2020)
• Page Start: 1176
• Page End: 1184
• Publication Date: 2020-10-06
• Subjects: Pharmacology -- Periodicals; Therapeutics -- Periodicals; 615.5
• DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2014
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0009-9236

Abstract

Abstract : Lopinavir/ritonavir, originally developed for treating HIV, is currently undergoing clinical studies for treating the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2). Although recent reports suggest that lopinavir exhibits in vitro efficacy against SARS‐CoV‐2, it is a highly protein‐bound drug and it remains unknown if it reaches adequate in vivo unbound (free) concentrations in lung tissue. We built a physiologically‐based pharmacokinetic model of lopinavir/ritonavir in white and Chinese populations. Our aim was to perform pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic correlations by comparing simulated free plasma and lung concentration values achieved using different dosing regimens of lopinavir/ritonavir with unbound half‐maximal effective concentration (EC50, unbound ) and unbound effective concentration 90% values of lopinavir against SARS‐CoV‐2. The model was validated against multiple observed clinical datasets for single and repeated dosing of lopinavir/ritonavir. Predicted pharmacokinetic parameters, such as the maximum plasma concentration, area under the plasma concentration‐time profile, oral clearance, half‐life, and minimum plasma concentration at steady‐state were within two‐fold of clinical values for both populations. Using the current lopinavir/ritonavir regimen of 400/100 mg twice daily, lopinavir does not achieve sufficient free lung concentrations for efficacy against SARS‐CoV‐2. Although the Chinese population reaches greater plasma and lung concentrations as compared with whites, our simulations suggest that a significant dose increase from the current clinically used dosing regimen is necessary to reach the EC50, unbound value for both populations. Based on safety data, higher doses would likely lead to QT prolongation and gastrointestinal disorders (nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea), thus, any dose adjustment must be carefully weighed alongside these safety concerns.