The experiences of hospital staff who provide care for people living with dementia: A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies. (15th May 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gwernan‐Jones, Ruth; Abbott, Rebecca; Lourida, Ilianna; Rogers, Morwenna; Green, Colin; Ball, Susan; Hemsley, Anthony; Cheeseman, Debbie; Clare, Linda; Moore, Darren A; Hussey, Chrissey; Coxon, George; Llewellyn, David J.; Naldrett, Tina; Thompson Coon, Jo
• Is Part Of: International journal of older people nursing. Volume 15:Number 4(2020:Dec.)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2020-05-15
• Subjects: delivery of health care -- dementia -- patient care -- personnel -- hospital -- qualitative research -- systematic review; Geriatrics -- Nursing -- Periodicals; Nursing -- Periodicals; Gerontology -- Periodicals; Clinical medicine -- Periodicals; 618.970231
• DOI: 10.1111/opn.12325
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1748-3735

Abstract

Abstract: Aims and objectives: To systematically review and synthesise qualitative data from studies exploring the experiences of hospital staff who care for people living with dementia (Plwd). Background: In hospital, the number of Plwd continues to rise; however, their experiences of care remain problematic. Negative experiences of care are likely to contribute to poorer mental and physical health outcomes for Plwd while in hospital and after discharge. Experiences of the hospital staff who care for Plwd can also be poor or unrewarding. It is important to understand the experiences of staff in order to improve staff well‐being and ultimately the experience of care for Plwd while in hospital. Design: Systematic review and evidence synthesis of qualitative research. Data sources: We searched 16 electronic databases in March 2018 and completed forward and backward citation chasing. Methods: Eligible studies explored the experiences of paid and unpaid staff providing care in hospital for Plwd. Study selection was undertaken independently by two reviewers, and quality appraisal was conducted. We prioritised included studies according to richness of text, methodological rigour and conceptual contribution. We adopted approaches of meta‐ethnography to analyse study findings, creating a conceptual model to represent the line of argument. Findings: Forty‐five studies reported in 58 papers met the inclusion criteria, and of these, we prioritised 19 studies reported in 24 papers. The line of argument was that Institutions can improve staff experiences of care for Plwd by fostering person‐centred care (PCC) . PCC aligned with staff perceptions of 'good care'; however, staff often felt prevented from providing PCC because of care cultures that prioritised tasks, routines and physical health. Staff experienced conflict over the care they wanted to give versus the care they were able to give, and this caused moral distress. When staff were able to provide PCC, this increased experiences of job satisfaction and emotional well‐being. Conclusions: Person‐centred care not only has the potential to improve the experience of care for Plwd and their carers, but can also improve the experiences of hospital staff caring for Plwd. However, without institutional‐level changes, hospital staff are often unable to provide PCC even when they have the experience and knowledge to do so. Implications for practice: Institutional‐level areas for change include the following: training; performance indicators and ward cultures that prioritise psychological needs alongside physical needs; adequate staffing levels; inclusive approaches to carers; physical environments that promote familiarisation, social interaction and occupation; systems of documentation about individual needs of Plwd; and cultures of sharing knowledge across hierarchies.