Functional outcomes of transurethral thulium laser enucleation versus bipolar transurethral resection for benign prostatic hyperplasia over a period of 12 months: A prospective randomized study. (16th August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Shoji, Sunao; Hanada, Izumi; Otaki, Tatsuya; Ogawa, Takahiro; Yamada, Koichiro; Uchida, Takato; Higure, Taro; Kawakami, Masayoshi; Kim, Hakushi; Nitta, Masahiro; Hasegawa, Masanori; Kawamura, Yoshiaki; Miyajima, Akira
• Is Part Of: International journal of urology. Volume 27:Number 11(2020)
• Page Start: 974
• Page End: 980
• Publication Date: 2020-08-16
• Subjects: benign prostatic hyperplasia -- bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate -- sexual function -- thulium enucleation of the prostate -- urinary function; Urology -- Periodicals; Genitourinary organs -- Periodicals; Urologic Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.6005
• DOI: 10.1111/iju.14341
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0919-8172

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: To evaluate functional outcomes over a year for benign prostatic hyperplasia treated with thulium laser enucleation of the prostate or bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate. Methods: In this study, we prospectively included 140 patients who were treated for benign prostatic hyperplasia from April 2017 to February 2019. A randomization list was used for non‐blind assignment to treatment groups (thulium laser enucleation of the prostate or bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate). The International Prostate Symptom Score, International Prostate Symptom Score quality of life, Overactive Bladder Symptom Score, uroflowmetry and International Index of Erectile Function‐5 were used for the assessment of outcomes. Scores were taken before treatment, and at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after treatment. Results: Preoperatively, characteristics of patients in the thulium laser enucleation of the prostate group ( n = 70) and the bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate group ( n = 70) did not significantly differ. The thulium laser enucleation of the prostate group had a lower median decrease in hemoglobin (0.10 g/dL vs 0.69 g/dL, P < 0.0001) and shorter median catheterization (2 days vs 3 days, P < 0.0001) than the bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate group. Both groups had significantly improved International Prostate Symptom Score, International Prostate Symptom Score quality of life, Overactive Bladder Symptom Score, maximum flow rate and residual urine compared with preoperative values. In the thulium laser enucleation of the prostate group, erectile function was significantly impaired at 1 month post‐treatment compared with pretreatment, but improved to baseline at 3 months; however, the transurethral resection of the prostate group did not recover. However, total energy ( P = 0.001) and laser irradiation time ( P = 0.025) were significantly different between the patients who had preserved erectile function and those who did not after the treatment in the thulium laser enucleation of the prostate group. Conclusions: Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate is superior to bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate in resection efficacy, hemostasis, catheterization time and preservation of erectile function. However, excessive laser irradiation time in thulium laser enucleation of the prostate has the possibility to delay improvement of overactive bladder symptoms and decrease sexual function.