BIOM-16. IMMUNOMIC ANALYSIS OF GLIOBLASTOMA (GBM) USING GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING. (9th November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Castro, Michael; Badra-Azar, Nilofar; Kessler, Thomas; Schütte, Moritz; Lange, Bodo; Yaspo, Marie-Laure
• Is Part Of: Neuro-oncology. Volume 22(2020)Supplement 2
• Page Start: ii5
• Page End: ii5
• Publication Date: 2020-11-09
• Subjects: Brain Neoplasms -- Periodicals; Brain -- Tumors -- Periodicals; Brain -- Cancer -- Periodicals; Nervous system -- Cancer -- Periodicals; 616.99481
• DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa215.016
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1522-8517

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Despite the success of immunotherapy across the spectrum of human cancer, a successful strategy has not emerged for GBM. While PD-L1 IHC and TMB have demonstrated some utility as predictors of immunotherapy benefit, responsiveness is complexly determined by factors affecting T cell trafficking, antigen presentation, other immune checkpoints, and mediators of immune exhaustion. Thus, we set out to to characterize mediators of immune resistance and their diversity in a population of GBM patients utilizing quantitative gene expression. METHODS: A set of 54 immunotherapy and checkpoint relevant genes and seven genes related to immune failure were selected from the literature. RNA gene counts for TCGA glioblastoma multiforme samples (N=163) were downloaded from https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/ . Annotation on subtypes and PFS values were obtained from PMID: 24120142. Gene expression normalization as FPKM, hierarchical clustering and box-plots were performed using R-3.6.0. Statistical differences of gene expression between subtypes were quantified using a TurkeyHSD test. RESULTS: A heatmap with hierarchical clustering for immune related genes for the TCGA GBM cohort was generated including colored annotation for the subtype and progression free survival. The graph shows a rough separation into two groups, where one group of the genes is tentatively associated with mesenchymal subtype and shorter survival and showing higher expression for most immune evasion genes. However, a heterogeneity of immune evasion signatures was identified within and across subtypes. Transcripts related to antigen presentation, EZH2, and LDHA varied significantly between GBM subtypes ( p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Gene expression analysis has utility to identify specific mediators of immune evasion and to inform the selection of combination therapies for discrete subsets of patients. A Bayesian approach to patient selection for specific immunotherapy strategies may enhance the likelihood of successful implementation of immunotherapy in the clinic.