Where Two Ends Meet: Operator and Stakeholder Perceptions of Procedures. (December 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mendoza, Anjelica M.; Liu, Sin-Ning C.; Dumlao, Stefan V.; Hendricks, Joseph W.; Son, Changwon; Sasangohar, Farzan; Peres, S. Camille
• Is Part Of: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ... Annual Meeting. Volume 64:Part 1(2020)
• Page Start: 1350
• Page End: 1354
• Publication Date: 2020-12
• Subjects: Human engineering -- Congresses; 620.8205
• DOI: 10.1177/1071181320641322
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1541-9312

Abstract

The differences between 'work as imagined' (WAI) and 'work as done' (WAD) reflect theoretically pervasive and well-known barriers to the examination of human performance at work. Due to the dynamic and situational nature of work, the idealized performance reflected in procedures is not always done as prescribed. The identification and examination of this gap and the nature of these deviations are imperative for high-risk industries. The present study used conventional content analysis to compare stakeholders' performance expectations to the realities of operator performance through interviews collected at a high-risk petrochemical producer. Direct comparisons of stakeholder and operator perspectives revealed divergent expectations of how procedures are used, when they're most useful, and reasons why operators don't utilize the procedure amendment process. These differences could be resolved through increased collaboration between stakeholders and operators. Future research should consider collaboration interventions to bridge the gap between WAI and WAD.