Cost-Utility of Intermediate Obstetric Critical Care in a Resource-Limited Setting: A Value-Based Analysis. Issue 1 (20th July 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Cost-Utility of Intermediate Obstetric Critical Care in a Resource-Limited Setting: A Value-Based Analysis. Issue 1 (20th July 2020)
- Main Title:
- Cost-Utility of Intermediate Obstetric Critical Care in a Resource-Limited Setting: A Value-Based Analysis
- Authors:
- Marotta, Claudia
Di Gennaro, Francesco
Pisani, Luigi
Pisani, Vincenzo
Senesie, Josephine
Bah, Sarjoh
Koroma, Michael M.
Caracciolo, Claudia
Putoto, Giovanni
Amatucci, Fabio
Borgonovi, Elio - Abstract:
- Background: Sierra Leone faces among the highest maternal mortality rates worldwide. Despite this burden, the role of life–saving critical care interventions in low–resource settings remains scarcely explored. A value-based approach may be used to question whether it is sustainable and useful to start and run an obstetric intermediate critical care facility in a resource–poor referral hospital. We also aimed to investigate whether patient outcomes in terms of quality of life justified the allocated resources. Objective: To explore the value-based dimension performing a cost-utility analysis with regard to the implementation and one-year operation of the HDU. The primary endopoint was the quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of patients admitted to the HDU, against direct and indirect costs. Secondary endpoints included key procedures or treatments performed during the HDU stay. Methods: The study was conducted from October 2, 2017 to October 1, 2018 in the obstetric high dependency unit (HDU) of Princess Christian Maternity Hospital (PCMH) in Freetown, Sierra Leone. Findings: 523 patients (median age 25 years, IQR 21–30) were admitted to HDU. The total 1 year investment and operation costs for the HDU amounted to €120, 082 – resulting in €230 of extra cost per admitted patient. The overall cost per QALY gained was of €10; this value is much lower than the WHO threshold defining high cost effectiveness of an intervention, i.e. three times the current Sierra Leone annual perBackground: Sierra Leone faces among the highest maternal mortality rates worldwide. Despite this burden, the role of life–saving critical care interventions in low–resource settings remains scarcely explored. A value-based approach may be used to question whether it is sustainable and useful to start and run an obstetric intermediate critical care facility in a resource–poor referral hospital. We also aimed to investigate whether patient outcomes in terms of quality of life justified the allocated resources. Objective: To explore the value-based dimension performing a cost-utility analysis with regard to the implementation and one-year operation of the HDU. The primary endopoint was the quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of patients admitted to the HDU, against direct and indirect costs. Secondary endpoints included key procedures or treatments performed during the HDU stay. Methods: The study was conducted from October 2, 2017 to October 1, 2018 in the obstetric high dependency unit (HDU) of Princess Christian Maternity Hospital (PCMH) in Freetown, Sierra Leone. Findings: 523 patients (median age 25 years, IQR 21–30) were admitted to HDU. The total 1 year investment and operation costs for the HDU amounted to €120, 082 – resulting in €230 of extra cost per admitted patient. The overall cost per QALY gained was of €10; this value is much lower than the WHO threshold defining high cost effectiveness of an intervention, i.e. three times the current Sierra Leone annual per capita GDP of €1416. Conclusion: With an additional cost per QALY of only €10.0, the implementation and one-year running of the case studied obstetric HDU can be considered a highly cost-effective frugal innovation in limited resource contexts. The evidences provided by this study allow a precise and novel insight to policy makers and clinicians useful to prioritize interventions in critical care and thus address maternal mortality in a high burden scenario. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Annals of global health. Volume 86:Issue 1(2020)
- Journal:
- Annals of global health
- Issue:
- Volume 86:Issue 1(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 86, Issue 1 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 86
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0086-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-07-20
- Subjects:
- 362.1
- Journal URLs:
- https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/annals-of-global-health ↗
https://www.annalsofglobalhealth.org/articles/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.5334/aogh.2907 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2214-9996
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store
- Ingest File:
- 14979.xml