High‐dose dexamethasone plus recombinant human thrombopoietin vs high‐dose dexamethasone alone as frontline treatment for newly diagnosed adult primary immune thrombocytopenia: A prospective, multicenter, randomized trial. Issue 12 (19th October 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- High‐dose dexamethasone plus recombinant human thrombopoietin vs high‐dose dexamethasone alone as frontline treatment for newly diagnosed adult primary immune thrombocytopenia: A prospective, multicenter, randomized trial. Issue 12 (19th October 2020)
- Main Title:
- High‐dose dexamethasone plus recombinant human thrombopoietin vs high‐dose dexamethasone alone as frontline treatment for newly diagnosed adult primary immune thrombocytopenia: A prospective, multicenter, randomized trial
- Authors:
- Yu, Yafei
Wang, Miaomiao
Hou, Yu
Qin, Ping
Zeng, Qingshu
Yu, Wenzheng
Guo, Xinhong
Wang, Jingxia
Wang, Xiaomin
Liu, Guoqiang
Chu, Xiaoxia
Yang, Lan
Feng, Ying
Zhou, Fang
Sun, Zhaogang
Zhang, Mei
Wang, Xin
Wang, Zhencheng
Ran, Xuehong
Zhao, Hongguo
Wang, Lei
Zhang, Haiyan
Bi, Kehong
Li, Daqi
Yuan, Chenglu
Xu, Ruirong
Wang, Yili
Zhou, Yuhong
Peng, Jun
Liu, Xin‐guang
Hou, Ming
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract: We conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of high‐dose dexamethasone (HD‐DXM) plus recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO), vs HD‐DXM alone in newly diagnosed adult immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) patients. Enrolled patients were randomly assigned to receive DXM plus rhTPO or DXM monotherapy. Another 4‐day course of DXM was repeated if response was not achieved by day 10 in both arms. One hundred patients in the HD‐DXM plus rhTPO arm and 96 patients in the HD‐DXM monotherapy arm were included in the full analysis set. So, HD‐DXM plus rhTPO resulted in a higher incidence of initial response (89.0% vs 66.7%, P < .001) and complete response (CR, 75.0% vs 42.7%, P < .001) compared with HD‐DXM monotherapy. Response rate at 6 months was also higher in the HD‐DXM plus rhTPO arm than that in the HD‐DXM monotherapy arm (51.0% vs 36.5%, P = .02; sustained CR: 46.0% vs 32.3%, P = .043). Throughout the follow‐up period, the overall duration of response was greater in the HD‐DXM plus rhTPO arm compared to the HD‐DXM monotherapy arm ( P = .04), as estimated by the Kaplan‐Meier analysis. The study drugs were generally well tolerated. In conclusion, the combination of HD‐DXM with rhTPO significantly improved the initial response and yielded favorable SR in newly diagnosed ITP patients, thus could be further validated as a frontline treatment for ITP. This study is registered as clinicaltrials.gov identifier:Abstract: We conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of high‐dose dexamethasone (HD‐DXM) plus recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO), vs HD‐DXM alone in newly diagnosed adult immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) patients. Enrolled patients were randomly assigned to receive DXM plus rhTPO or DXM monotherapy. Another 4‐day course of DXM was repeated if response was not achieved by day 10 in both arms. One hundred patients in the HD‐DXM plus rhTPO arm and 96 patients in the HD‐DXM monotherapy arm were included in the full analysis set. So, HD‐DXM plus rhTPO resulted in a higher incidence of initial response (89.0% vs 66.7%, P < .001) and complete response (CR, 75.0% vs 42.7%, P < .001) compared with HD‐DXM monotherapy. Response rate at 6 months was also higher in the HD‐DXM plus rhTPO arm than that in the HD‐DXM monotherapy arm (51.0% vs 36.5%, P = .02; sustained CR: 46.0% vs 32.3%, P = .043). Throughout the follow‐up period, the overall duration of response was greater in the HD‐DXM plus rhTPO arm compared to the HD‐DXM monotherapy arm ( P = .04), as estimated by the Kaplan‐Meier analysis. The study drugs were generally well tolerated. In conclusion, the combination of HD‐DXM with rhTPO significantly improved the initial response and yielded favorable SR in newly diagnosed ITP patients, thus could be further validated as a frontline treatment for ITP. This study is registered as clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01734044. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- American journal of hematology. Volume 95:Issue 12(2020:Dec.)
- Journal:
- American journal of hematology
- Issue:
- Volume 95:Issue 12(2020:Dec.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 95, Issue 12 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 95
- Issue:
- 12
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0095-0012-0000
- Page Start:
- 1542
- Page End:
- 1552
- Publication Date:
- 2020-10-19
- Subjects:
- Hematology -- Periodicals
616.15 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1096-8652 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/ajh.25989 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0361-8609
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0824.800000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 14977.xml