Optimized MLAA for quantitative non-TOF PET/MR of the brain. (2nd December 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Benoit, Didier; Ladefoged, Claes N; Rezaei, Ahmadreza; Keller, Sune H; Andersen, Flemming L; Højgaard, Liselotte; Hansen, Adam E; Holm, Søren; Nuyts, Johan
• Is Part Of: Physics in medicine & biology. Volume 61:Number 24(2016:Dec.)
• Page Start: 8854
• Page End: 8874
• Publication Date: 2016-12-02
• Subjects: PET -- MRI -- attenuation correction -- joint activity and attenuation estimation -- maximum likelihood; Biophysics -- Periodicals; Medical physics -- Periodicals; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/61/24/8854
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0031-9155

Abstract

Abstract: For quantitative tracer distribution in positron emission tomography, attenuation correction is essential. In a hybrid PET/CT system the CT images serve as a basis for generation of the attenuation map, but in PET/MR, the MR images do not have a similarly simple relationship with the attenuation map. Hence attenuation correction in PET/MR systems is more challenging. Typically either of two MR sequences are used: the Dixon or the ultra-short time echo (UTE) techniques. However these sequences have some well-known limitations. In this study, a reconstruction technique based on a modified and optimized non-TOF MLAA is proposed for PET/MR brain imaging. The idea is to tune the parameters of the MLTR applying some information from an attenuation image computed from the UTE sequences and a T1w MR image. In this MLTR algorithm, an α j parameter is introduced and optimized in order to drive the algorithm to a final attenuation map most consistent with the emission data. Because the non-TOF MLAA is used, a technique to reduce the cross-talk effect is proposed. In this study, the proposed algorithm is compared to the common reconstruction methods such as OSEM using a CT attenuation map, considered as the reference, and OSEM using the Dixon and UTE attenuation maps. To show the robustness and the reproducibility of the proposed algorithm, a set of 204 [ 18 F]FDG patients, 35 [ 11 C]PiB patients and 1 [ 18 F]FET patient are used. The results show that by choosing an optimized value of α j in MLTR, the proposed algorithm improves the results compared to the standard MR-based attenuation correction methods (i.e. OSEM using the Dixon or the UTE attenuation maps), and the cross-talk and the scale problem are limited.