Comparative Safety and Efficacy of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion with the Watchman Device and Amplatzer Cardiac Plug: Results of the Russian National Registry. (9th November 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparative Safety and Efficacy of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion with the Watchman Device and Amplatzer Cardiac Plug: Results of the Russian National Registry. (9th November 2020)
- Main Title:
- Comparative Safety and Efficacy of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion with the Watchman Device and Amplatzer Cardiac Plug: Results of the Russian National Registry
- Authors:
- Davtyan, Karapet
Simonyan, Georgiy
Topchyan, Arpi
Kalemberg, Andrey
Romanov, Alexander
Shabanov, Vitaliy
Lebedev, Dmitriy
Gureev, Sergey
Miller, Yulia
Merkulov, Evgeniy
Pevzner, Dmitry
Mozgovoy, Pavel
Ufimtsev, Vladimir
Boytsov, Sergey
Drapkina, Oksana - Other Names:
- Xu Gelin Academic Editor.
- Abstract:
- Abstract : Purpose . This multicenter, prospective registry evaluated the comparative safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) using the Watchman device (WD) and the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (ACP) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in real-world clinical practice in Russia. Methods . The study included data from 200 consecutive NVAF patients (66.8 ± 7.8 years, 44.5% female, median CHA2DS2VASc 4, median HAS-BLED 3) who had undergone LAAO implantation using WD (n = 108 ) or ACP (n = 92 ) from September 2015 to December 2017 in 5 medical centers in Russia. The primary safety endpoint was the procedure-related major adverse events, and the primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of thromboembolic events, device thrombosis, hemorrhagic events, and unexplained death during the 12-month follow-up. Results . Successful LAAO was performed in all 92 (100%) patients with ACP and 105 (97.2%) with WD (p = 0.053 ). At 12 months, primary safety endpoint occurred in 6.5% of patients in the ACP group with no events in the WD group (6.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.008 ). During the 12-month follow-up, the primary efficacy endpoint has occurred in 8.3% of patients in the WD group (n = 9 ) and 1.1% of patients in the ACP group (n = 1 ) (p = 0.016 ). Conclusions . In this multicenter prospective registry, LAA closure with the WD was associated with significantly higher thromboembolic events rate in NVAF patients. Patients, receiving the ACP, had moreAbstract : Purpose . This multicenter, prospective registry evaluated the comparative safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) using the Watchman device (WD) and the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (ACP) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in real-world clinical practice in Russia. Methods . The study included data from 200 consecutive NVAF patients (66.8 ± 7.8 years, 44.5% female, median CHA2DS2VASc 4, median HAS-BLED 3) who had undergone LAAO implantation using WD (n = 108 ) or ACP (n = 92 ) from September 2015 to December 2017 in 5 medical centers in Russia. The primary safety endpoint was the procedure-related major adverse events, and the primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of thromboembolic events, device thrombosis, hemorrhagic events, and unexplained death during the 12-month follow-up. Results . Successful LAAO was performed in all 92 (100%) patients with ACP and 105 (97.2%) with WD (p = 0.053 ). At 12 months, primary safety endpoint occurred in 6.5% of patients in the ACP group with no events in the WD group (6.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.008 ). During the 12-month follow-up, the primary efficacy endpoint has occurred in 8.3% of patients in the WD group (n = 9 ) and 1.1% of patients in the ACP group (n = 1 ) (p = 0.016 ). Conclusions . In this multicenter prospective registry, LAA closure with the WD was associated with significantly higher thromboembolic events rate in NVAF patients. Patients, receiving the ACP, had more procedure-related major adverse events. However, further multicenter studies are necessary to evaluate these findings. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BioMed research international. Volume 2020(2020)
- Journal:
- BioMed research international
- Issue:
- Volume 2020(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 2020, Issue 2020 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 2020
- Issue:
- 2020
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-2020-2020-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-11-09
- Subjects:
- Medicine -- Periodicals
Biology -- Periodicals
Biotechnology -- Periodicals
Life sciences -- Periodicals
610.5 - Journal URLs:
- https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/ ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1155/2020/2352648 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2314-6133
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store
- Ingest File:
- 14960.xml