P1496Impact of electrical reverse remodeling by cardiac resynchronization therapy on adverse cardiac events in patients of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. (18th June 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kobayashi, H; Okada, A; Tabata, H; Shoin, W; Okano, T; Yoshie, K; Shoda, M; Kuwahara, K
• Is Part Of: Europace. Volume 22(2020)Supplement 1
• Publication Date: 2020-06-18
• Subjects: Arrhythmia -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Cardiac pacing -- Periodicals; Catheter ablation -- Periodicals; Heart -- Physiology -- Periodicals; Electrophysiology -- Periodicals; 617.4120645
• DOI: 10.1093/europace/euaa162.266
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1099-5129

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Recently, structural reverse remodeling (SRR) and electrical reverse remodeling (ERR) after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) have been reported in patients of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However the relationship between ERR and subsequent adverse cardiac events is still unknown. We aimed to elucidate the impact of ERR after CRT on the occurrence of heart failure events and ventricular arrhythmias. Methods: A total of 36 HFrEF patients who underwent newly CRT implantation were investigated retrospectively. The intrinsic QRS duration (iQRSd) had been recorded before and more than 6 months after CRT implantation. Biventricular pacing was temporarily turned off during measurement of iQRSd. ERR was defined as positive shortening of iQRSd and SRR was defined as reduction of left ventricular end systolic volume by more than 15% after CRT implantation. The primary endpoint was a composite of all cause death, heart failure hospitalizations and ventricular tachyarrhythmia events. Results: ERR was observed in 17 patients (47.2%) and SRR in 22 patients (61.1%). The group with ERR included more patients with lower NYHA class prior to CRT and patients with SRR. The primary endpoint was observed in 15 patients (51.4 %) for a median of 181 [63, 367] days during follow-up. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the group without ERR was poor prognosis compared with the group with ERR (p = 0.022, Log-rank test). Conclusion: Patients of HFrEF with ERR after CRT may have fewer adverse cardiac events such as worsening heart failure or ventricular arrhythmia events from this short-term study.