P1107First results of molecular autopsy examinations in sudden cardiac death drawn from nationwide multidisciplinary and multicentric collaboration in the Czech Republic. (18th June 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Krebsova, A; Votypka, P; Peldova, P; Rucklova, K; Pilin, A; Kulvajtova, M; Pohlova -Kucerova, S; Blankova, A; Tavacova, T; Petrkova, J; Tomasek, P; Macek Sr, M; Macek Jr, M; Janousek, J; Kautzner, J
• Is Part Of: Europace. Volume 22(2020)Supplement 1
• Publication Date: 2020-06-18
• Subjects: Arrhythmia -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Cardiac pacing -- Periodicals; Catheter ablation -- Periodicals; Heart -- Physiology -- Periodicals; Electrophysiology -- Periodicals; 617.4120645
• DOI: 10.1093/europace/euaa162.147
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1099-5129

Abstract

Abstract: Funding Acknowledgements: Supported by Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic, grant nr. NV18-02-00237. All rights reserved." Introduction: "Molecular autopsy" in sudden cardiac death (SCD) is an important diagnostic tool for primary prevention of cardiac arrest in victim´s relatives and requires multicentric and multidisciplinary collaboration. Purpose: To establish a national network for SCD diagnostics, to assess the acceptance of genetic testing in at risk relatives and to elucidate the genetic etiology of SCD in a representative Czech cohort aged below 45 years. Patients and Methods: Between 2016 and 2019 we ascertained 70 SCD (50 M / 20 F), with positive family history for cardiac arrest in 8/70 cases. Only one family did not agree with molecular autopsy. Genetic counselling and cardiological screening examination was carried out in first degree relatives of SCD survivors accompanied by custom-made targeted panel massively parallel DNA sequencing comprising 100 cardiac conditions-related genes. Presence of pathogenic variants was validated by Sanger DNA sequencing and through family segregation analyses. Results: According to post-mortem diagnosis most victims died of HCM (17/70), ACM (16/70), no structural heart disease was found in 15/70 cases, DCM/LVNC in 9/70, 6/70 were SIDS cases, other rare diagnoses comprised aortic dissection, or myocarditis. Most of victims died at sleep, only 9/70 victims died during strenuous activities. About 50% of SCD victims did not have cardiac complaints before death. Very likely or certain molecular etiology (i.e. based on presence of ACMG.net Class 4 to 5 variants) was disclosed in 12/70 (17%) in RYR2, FLNC, TTN, KCNH2 and KCNQ1 genes, whilst potentially causative DNA variants (Classes 3-4) were observed in 13/70 (18%) cases. In SIDS we did not find any pathogenic variants. Interestingly, the KCNE1 p.Asp85Asn (LQT 5 lite) variant, was detected in 3/70 cases as a recognized risk factor for ventricular arrhythmias. Conclusion: The multidisciplinary cooperation in Czech Republic has been established, family survivors are willing to receive genetic and cardiological care, while centralised molecular genetic analysis enables reliable results which are in accordance with other multicentric studies. The molecular autopsy should, especially in SIDS, be expanded to whole exome sequencing.