Intralesional curettage versus prosthetic replacement for bone tumors — a finite element analysis case of limb salvage simulation in biomechanics. (January 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Intralesional curettage versus prosthetic replacement for bone tumors — a finite element analysis case of limb salvage simulation in biomechanics. (January 2021)
- Main Title:
- Intralesional curettage versus prosthetic replacement for bone tumors — a finite element analysis case of limb salvage simulation in biomechanics
- Authors:
- Peng, Matthew JianQiao
Cao, XiongWei
Chen, Hai-Yan
Hu, Yong
Li, XinXu
Lao, YongQiang
Bai, Bo - Abstract:
- Highlights: Curettage or Prosthetics for GCT controversial. Surgical simulation adjusting limb salvage surgery. Numerical models harmless to humans. Stress & displacement analyzed by FEA. Prosthetic replacement is optimal. Abstract: Background and objectives: To compare mechanical properties of femoral tumor treatments so that better operative strategy for limb tumors surgery is optimized. Methods: Fourteen femoral CT images were randomly selected to rebuild 3D models by MIMICS. They were then executed by reverse engineering softwares for simulative modes. Mode #1: Intralesional curettage with cement filled plus fixator; Mode #2: Distal femur resection with tumorous prosthesis replaced. Finally, the mechanical aspects such as stress and displacement were compared by finite element analysis. Results: Analyzed by AnSys, the observation indexes were measured as follows: for displacement of femurs, d=1.4762 (< a=3.9042 < c=3.9845 < b=4.1159) in mm is the most staple of all models; for displacement of implants (fixators or prostheses), it's similar to the behavior of femurs and with no significant difference; for stresses of femurs, no significant difference was found among all models; the stresses of implants (fixations and prostheses) were observed as d=39.6334 (< a=58.6206 < c=61.8150 < b=62.6626) in MPa correspondently, which is the least; for stresses of the general system, the average of peak values for integrated devices of all models are: d=40.8072 (< a=58.6206 <Highlights: Curettage or Prosthetics for GCT controversial. Surgical simulation adjusting limb salvage surgery. Numerical models harmless to humans. Stress & displacement analyzed by FEA. Prosthetic replacement is optimal. Abstract: Background and objectives: To compare mechanical properties of femoral tumor treatments so that better operative strategy for limb tumors surgery is optimized. Methods: Fourteen femoral CT images were randomly selected to rebuild 3D models by MIMICS. They were then executed by reverse engineering softwares for simulative modes. Mode #1: Intralesional curettage with cement filled plus fixator; Mode #2: Distal femur resection with tumorous prosthesis replaced. Finally, the mechanical aspects such as stress and displacement were compared by finite element analysis. Results: Analyzed by AnSys, the observation indexes were measured as follows: for displacement of femurs, d=1.4762 (< a=3.9042 < c=3.9845 < b=4.1159) in mm is the most staple of all models; for displacement of implants (fixators or prostheses), it's similar to the behavior of femurs and with no significant difference; for stresses of femurs, no significant difference was found among all models; the stresses of implants (fixations and prostheses) were observed as d=39.6334 (< a=58.6206 < c=61.8150 < b=62.6626) in MPa correspondently, which is the least; for stresses of the general system, the average of peak values for integrated devices of all models are: d=40.8072 (< a=58.6206 < c=61.7831< b=62.6626) in MPa, which is also the least. As a final result, both maximum values for displacement and stress of mode 2 are lower than those of mode 1. Conclusions: Our finite element analysis of limb salvage simulation in biomechanics proved that, to treat distal femoral bone tumors, prosthetic replacement is more efficient than intralesional curettage. Graphical abstract: Image, graphical abstract … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Computer methods and programs in biomedicine. Volume 198(2021)
- Journal:
- Computer methods and programs in biomedicine
- Issue:
- Volume 198(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 198, Issue 2021 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 198
- Issue:
- 2021
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0198-2021-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-01
- Subjects:
- Intralesional curettage -- Prosthetic replacement -- Bone tumor -- Limb salvage -- Simulation
3D Three Dimensions -- FEA Finite Element Analysis -- FEM Finite Element Method
Medicine -- Computer programs -- Periodicals
Biology -- Computer programs -- Periodicals
Computers -- Periodicals
Medicine -- Periodicals
Médecine -- Logiciels -- Périodiques
Biologie -- Logiciels -- Périodiques
Biology -- Computer programs
Medicine -- Computer programs
Periodicals
Electronic journals
610.28 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01692607 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105775 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0169-2607
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3394.095000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 14961.xml