Comparing the Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of Abdominal-based Autogenous Tissue and Tissue-Expander Implant: A Feasibility Study. Issue 10 (October 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparing the Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of Abdominal-based Autogenous Tissue and Tissue-Expander Implant: A Feasibility Study. Issue 10 (October 2020)
- Main Title:
- Comparing the Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of Abdominal-based Autogenous Tissue and Tissue-Expander Implant
- Authors:
- Thoma, Achilles
Avram, Ronen
Dal Cin, Arianna
Murphy, Jessica
Duku, Eric
Xie, Feng - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: To determine the superiority of autologous abdominal tissue (AAT) or tissue-expander implant (TE/I) reconstruction, a robust comparative cohort study is required. This study sought to determine the feasibility of a future large pragmatic cohort study comparing clinical and cost-effectiveness of AAT and TE/I at 12 months postoperative. Methods: Potential participants were screened during consultation with their surgeon. Three health-related quality-of-life scales, the Health Utility Index Mark 3, the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey, and the BREAST-Q were used preoperatively, 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Direct medical costs and postoperative patient/caregiver productivity loss were collected using patient diaries. Feasibility was assessed through patient recruitment rates and compliance of patients and study staff to complete required study documentation. Results: Sixty-three patients consented to participate, 44 completed baseline questionnaires; the feasibility objective of recruiting 80% of eligible patients was not met. A 90% completion rate for patient questionnaires was seen at 1-month follow-up and decreased up to 12 months. Quality-adjusted life years were calculated at 0.77 and 0.89 for the AAT and TE/I group, respectively. Case report form completion by study staff and patient diary completion was moderate and low, respectively. Collaborating with hospital case-costing specialists to identify direct medical costs was reliable andAbstract : Background: To determine the superiority of autologous abdominal tissue (AAT) or tissue-expander implant (TE/I) reconstruction, a robust comparative cohort study is required. This study sought to determine the feasibility of a future large pragmatic cohort study comparing clinical and cost-effectiveness of AAT and TE/I at 12 months postoperative. Methods: Potential participants were screened during consultation with their surgeon. Three health-related quality-of-life scales, the Health Utility Index Mark 3, the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey, and the BREAST-Q were used preoperatively, 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Direct medical costs and postoperative patient/caregiver productivity loss were collected using patient diaries. Feasibility was assessed through patient recruitment rates and compliance of patients and study staff to complete required study documentation. Results: Sixty-three patients consented to participate, 44 completed baseline questionnaires; the feasibility objective of recruiting 80% of eligible patients was not met. A 90% completion rate for patient questionnaires was seen at 1-month follow-up and decreased up to 12 months. Quality-adjusted life years were calculated at 0.77 and 0.89 for the AAT and TE/I group, respectively. Case report form completion by study staff and patient diary completion was moderate and low, respectively. Collaborating with hospital case-costing specialists to identify direct medical costs was reliable and efficient. Conclusions: A future large-scale study is feasible. However, due to a diminishing rate of questionnaire completion, almost twice as many patients need to be recruited than expected to have adequate power. Cost data collection from hospital sources was reliable. Case report forms need to be tailored more toward a busy hospital setting. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Volume 8:Issue 10(2020)
- Journal:
- Plastic and reconstructive surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 8:Issue 10(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 8, Issue 10 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 8
- Issue:
- 10
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0008-0010-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-10
- Subjects:
- Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals
Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures -- Periodicals
617.95205 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003179 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2169-7574
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 14953.xml