Successful intraoperative management in patients with abdominal compartment syndrome induced by giant liposarcomas: Two case reports. Issue 40 (2nd October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Liu, Huaqin; Hu, Tao; Li, Yuekao; Yue, Zhifeng; Zhang, Fengjiao; Fu, Jianfeng
• Other Names: Saranathan. Maya section editor.
• Is Part Of: Medicine. Volume 99:Issue 40(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-10-02
• Subjects: abdominal compartment syndrome -- intra-abdominal hypertension -- liposarcoma -- mechanical ventilation -- transesophageal echocardiography; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Périodiques; Geneeskunde; Medicine; Periodicals; Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022575
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-7974

Abstract

Abstract: Rationale: Giant intra-abdominal liposarcomas weighing over 20 kg often increase the intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), which has severe effects on the cardiovascular and respiratory systems. Abdominal compartment syndrome is defined typically as the combination of a raised IAP of 20 mm Hg or higher and new onset of organ dysfunction or failure. The anesthetic management and perioperative management are very challenging. Patients concerns: We presented 2 patients with rare giant growing liposarcoma of the abdomen, weighing 21 kg and over 35 kg, respectively. Circulatory management was particularly difficult in the first case, while respiratory management and massive blood loss was very challenging in the second one. Diagnosis: With a computed tomography scan and peritoneal-to-abdominal height ratio measurement, preoperatively the risk of developing intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome was recognized early in each patient. The inferior vena cava and right atrium of the first patient was compressed and malformed due to the uplifted diaphragm, while there was severe decreased lung volume and increased airway resistance, because of rare giant retroperitoneal liposarcomas in the second case. Histologic examination revealed dedifferentiated liposarcoma in both cases. Interventions: Both of the patients underwent resection surgery with multiple monitoring; transesophageal echocardiography monitoring in the first case and pressure-controlled ventilation volume guaranteed mechanical ventilation mode in both cases. Outcomes: Intraoperatively and postoperatively no cardiopulmonary complications in both patients. The first patient was discharged without any complications on postoperative day 10, and the second patient underwent another surgery because of anastomotic leakage resulting from bowel resection. Lessons: Multiple monitorings, in particular transesophageal echocardiography should be considered in patients with increased IAP due to a giant mass, while an appropriate lung protection ventilation strategy is crucial in these patients.