Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of diabetes insipidus: Update. Issue 5 (September 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Refardt, Julie
• Is Part Of: Best practice & research. Volume 34:Issue 5(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-09
• Subjects: copeptin -- diabetes insipidus -- primary polydipsia -- polyuria-polydipsia syndrome -- diagnosis; Endocrine glands -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Metabolism -- Disorders -- Periodicals; Endocrinology -- Periodicals; Metabolism -- Periodicals; 616.4
• DOI: 10.1016/j.beem.2020.101398
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1521-690X

Abstract

Abstract : The two main differential diagnoses of central diabetes insipidus are nephrogenic diabetes insipidus and primary polydipsia. Reliable distinction between those entities is essential as treatment differs substantially with the wrong treatment potentially leading to serious complications. Past diagnostic measures using the indirect water deprivation test had several pitfalls, resulting in a low diagnostic accuracy. With the introduction of copeptin, a stable and reliable surrogate marker for arginine vasopressin, diagnosis of diabetes insipidus was new evaluated. While unstimulated basal copeptin measurement reliably diagnoses nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, a stimulation test is needed to differentiate patients with central diabetes insipidus from patients with primary polydipsia. Stimulation can either be achieved through hypertonic saline infusion or arginine infusion. While the former showed high diagnostic accuracy and superiority over the indirect water deprivation test in a recent validation study, the diagnostic accuracy for arginine-stimulated copeptin was slightly lower, but superior in test tolerance. In summary of the recent findings, a new copeptin based diagnostic algorithm is proposed for the reliable diagnosis of diabetes insipidus.