Integrated histological and molecular analyses of rebiopsy samples at osimertinib progression improve post-progression survivals: A single-center retrospective study. (December 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Integrated histological and molecular analyses of rebiopsy samples at osimertinib progression improve post-progression survivals: A single-center retrospective study. (December 2020)
- Main Title:
- Integrated histological and molecular analyses of rebiopsy samples at osimertinib progression improve post-progression survivals: A single-center retrospective study
- Authors:
- Cheng, Jiang-Tao
Yao, Yi-Hui
Gao, Yu-Er
Zhang, Shi-Ling
Chen, Hua-Jun
Wang, Zhen
Yan, Hong-Hong
Zhou, Qing
Tu, Hai-Yan
Zhang, Xu-Chao
Su, Jian
Xie, Zhi
Lizaso, Analyn
Chen, Shu-Yin
Lin, Xuan
Xiang, Jian-xing
Wu, Yi-Long
Yang, Jin-Ji - Abstract:
- Highlights: Targeted therapy after osimertinib progression improves survival outcomes. Patients with actionable markers and received matched therapy had better outcomes. NGS of rebiopsy at osimertinib progression individualizes treatment strategies. NGS of rebiopsy specimens should be standard-of-care after osimertinib progression. Abstract: Background: This single-center retrospective cohort study sought to investigate the impact of rebiopsy analysis after osimertinib progression in improving the survival outcomes. Methods: Eighty-nine patients with EGFR T790M-positive advanced NSCLC who received second- or further-line osimertinib between January 2017 and July 2019 were included in this study. The co-primary study endpoints were post-progression progression-free survival (pPFS), defined as the time from osimertinib progression until progression from further-line treatment, and post-progression overall survival (pOS), defined as the time from osimertinib progression until death or the last follow-up date. Results: Pairwise analysis revealed that receiving targeted therapy as further-line treatment after osimertinib progression did not statistically improve the pPFS (P = 0.285) or the pOS (P = 0.903) compared to chemotherapy. However, patients who submitted rebiopsy samples at osimertinib progression for histological and molecular analyses, particularly those who had actionable markers and received highly matched therapy, had significantly longer pPFS and pOS as compared toHighlights: Targeted therapy after osimertinib progression improves survival outcomes. Patients with actionable markers and received matched therapy had better outcomes. NGS of rebiopsy at osimertinib progression individualizes treatment strategies. NGS of rebiopsy specimens should be standard-of-care after osimertinib progression. Abstract: Background: This single-center retrospective cohort study sought to investigate the impact of rebiopsy analysis after osimertinib progression in improving the survival outcomes. Methods: Eighty-nine patients with EGFR T790M-positive advanced NSCLC who received second- or further-line osimertinib between January 2017 and July 2019 were included in this study. The co-primary study endpoints were post-progression progression-free survival (pPFS), defined as the time from osimertinib progression until progression from further-line treatment, and post-progression overall survival (pOS), defined as the time from osimertinib progression until death or the last follow-up date. Results: Pairwise analysis revealed that receiving targeted therapy as further-line treatment after osimertinib progression did not statistically improve the pPFS (P = 0.285) or the pOS (P = 0.903) compared to chemotherapy. However, patients who submitted rebiopsy samples at osimertinib progression for histological and molecular analyses, particularly those who had actionable markers and received highly matched therapy, had significantly longer pPFS and pOS as compared to those who received low-level matched therapy (pPFS = 10.0 m vs. 4.1 m, P = 0.005; pOS = 19.4 m vs. 10.0 m, P = 0.023), unmatched therapy (pPFS = 10.0 m vs. 4.7 m, P = 0.009; pOS = 19.4 m vs. 7.0 m, P = 0.001), and those without rebiopsy data (Rebiopsy vs Non-rebiopsy; pPFS = 6.1 m vs. 3.3 m, P = 0.014; pOS = 11.7 m vs. 6.8 m, P = 0.011). Conclusion: Our real-world cohort study demonstrates that integrated histological and molecular analyses of rebiopsy specimens after osimertinib progression could provide more opportunities for individualized treatments to improve the post-progression survival of patients with advanced NSCLC. Our findings provide clinical evidence that supports the inclusion of NGS-based analysis of rebiopsy specimens as standard-of-care after osimertinib progression and warrants further prospective evaluation. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Lung cancer. Volume 150(2020)
- Journal:
- Lung cancer
- Issue:
- Volume 150(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 150, Issue 2020 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 150
- Issue:
- 2020
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0150-2020-0000
- Page Start:
- 97
- Page End:
- 106
- Publication Date:
- 2020-12
- Subjects:
- CI confidence interval -- CN copy number -- EGFR epidermal growth factor receptor -- FISH fluorescence in situ hybridization -- HR hazard ratio -- IHC immunohistochemistry -- NEC neuroendocrine carcinoma -- NGS next-generation sequencing -- NCCN National Comprehensive Cancer Network -- NSCLC non-small cell lung cancer -- ORR objective response rate -- OS overall survival -- PD progressive disease -- PFS progression-free survival -- pOS post-progression overall survival -- pPFS post-progression progression-free survival -- RECIST Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors -- SCLC small-cell lung carcinoma -- SCC squamous cell carcinoma -- TKI tyrosine kinase inhibitor
EGFR -- EGFR T790M -- Non-small cell lung cancer -- Osimertinib -- Post-progression outcomes -- Rebiopsy
Lungs -- Cancer -- Periodicals
Lung Neoplasms -- Abstracts
Lung Neoplasms -- Periodicals
Poumons -- Cancer -- Périodiques
Lungs -- Cancer
Periodicals
Electronic journals
Electronic journals
616.99424 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01695002 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/01695002 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/01695002 ↗
http://www.lungcancerjournal.info/issues ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.10.010 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0169-5002
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5307.245000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 14928.xml