Benefit–Cost Analysis of Community-Led Total Sanitation: Incorporating Results from Recent Evaluations. Issue 3 (4th May 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Radin, Mark; Jeuland, Marc; Wang, Hua; Whittington, Dale
• Is Part Of: Journal of benefit-cost analysis. Volume 11:Issue 3(2020)
• Page Start: 380
• Page End: 417
• Publication Date: 2020-05-04
• Subjects: community-led total sanitation, -- cost-benefit analysis, -- randomized controlled trials; I30, -- O35, -- Q01; Cost effectiveness -- Periodicals; 658.1554
• DOI: 10.1017/bca.2020.6
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2194-5888

Abstract

Abstract: We analyze the economic costs and benefits of "community-led total sanitation" (CLTS), a sanitation intervention that relies on community-level behavioral change, in a hypothetical rural region in sub-Saharan Africa with 200 villages and 100, 000 people. The analysis incorporates data on the effectiveness of CLTS from recent randomized controlled trials and other evaluations. The net benefits of this intervention are estimated both with and without the inclusion of a positive health externality, that is, the additional reduction in diarrhea for an individual when a sufficient proportion of other individuals in the community construct and use latrines and thereby decrease the overall load of waterborne pathogens and fecal bacteria in the environment. We find that CLTS interventions would pass a benefit–cost test in many situations, but that outcomes are not as favorable as some previous studies suggest. The model results are sensitive to baseline conditions, including the value of time, income level used to calculate the value of a statistical life, discount rate, case fatality rate, diarrhea incidence, and time spent traveling to defecation sites. We conclude that many communities likely have economic investment opportunities that are more attractive than CLTS, and recommend careful economic analysis of CLTS in specific locations.