Pain perception during transabdominal chorionic villus sampling: a randomized trial comparing topical ethyl chloride anesthetic spray and lidocaine injection. (1st February 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rekawek, Patricia; Stone, Joanne L.; Robles, Brittany; Connolly, Katherine A.; Bigelow, Catherine A.; Tudela, Felipe; Bianco, Angela T.
• Is Part Of: Journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine. Volume 34:Number 3(2021)
• Page Start: 339
• Page End: 345
• Publication Date: 2021-02-01
• Subjects: Chorionic villus sampling -- lidocaine -- pain perception; Obstetrics -- Periodicals; Perinatology -- Periodicals; Infants (Newborn) -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Neonatology -- Periodicals; 618.2
• DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1607288
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1476-7058

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Chorionic villus sampling is an important invasive procedure used for early antenatal genetic testing that can be associated with anxiety and fear of pain. Pain analgesia prior to chorionic villus sampling can be offered with subdermal lidocaine; however, lidocaine injection itself is associated with pain. Our objective was to determine whether administration of topical ethyl chloride anesthetic spray is associated with decreased pain perception during transabdominal chorionic villus sampling compared to 1% lidocaine subdermal injection. Study design: Women undergoing transabdominal chorionic villus sampling from 10 to 13 weeks and 6 days in an outpatient setting were randomized with equal allocation to either 1% lidocaine injection or topical ethyl chloride anesthetic spray prior to the procedure. Women were asked about their pain on a scale of 0–100 prior to, during, and after the procedure. The primary outcome was pain perception during time of transabdominal chorionic villus sampling as measured on a 100-mm visual analog scale. The secondary outcome was pain immediately after procedure. Results: From October 2016 to June 2017, a total of 120 women were enrolled (63 in the lidocaine injection group and 57 in the topical ethyl chloride anesthetic spray group). Baseline demographic characteristics were similar between groups. During the procedure, patients in the topical ethyl chloride arm demonstrated significantly higher pain scores compared to the lidocaine injection group (median score of 50 mm (interquartile range [IQR]: 40–65) versus 50 mm (IQR: 30–60); p = .03). There was no significant difference in pain scores before or after the procedure. Conclusion: During transabdominal chorionic villus sampling procedures, topical ethyl chloride anesthetic spray is associated with a higher distribution of pain scores as compared to 1% lidocaine subdermal injection, which suggests higher levels of pain. Clinical trial registration : This trial is registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03140293). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03140293?term=NCT03140293&rank=1 .