The Challenges of Treating Female Soccer Players With ACL Injuries: Hamstring Versus Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Autograft. Issue 11 (25th November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Britt, Elise; Ouillette, Ryan; Edmonds, Eric; Chambers, Henry; Johnson, Kristina; Bastrom, Tracey; Pennock, Andrew
• Is Part Of: Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine. Volume 8:Issue 11(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-11-25
• Subjects: anterior cruciate ligament -- ACL reconstruction -- female soccer player -- adolescent -- return to sport -- retear -- BTB autograft -- hamstring autograft; Sports medicine -- Periodicals; Orthopedics -- Periodicals; Arthroscopy -- Periodicals; Arthroplasty -- Periodicals; Knee -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 616.7
• DOI: 10.1177/2325967120964884
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2325-9671

Abstract

Background: Although anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are common in female soccer players, the optimal graft option for ACL reconstruction is currently unclear. Purpose/Hypothesis: To compare the outcomes of female soccer players after ACL reconstruction using either hamstring tendon autograft or bone–patellar tendon–bone (BTB) autograft. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in clinical outcome scores, return to sport, or retear rates between BTB and hamstring grafts in our study cohort. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all skeletally mature adolescent female soccer players who underwent primary ACL reconstruction using either hamstring tendon or BTB autograft between 2013 and 2016. Demographic, injury, and surgical variables were documented. Outcome measures included the Lysholm score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Tegner activity score, and visual analog scales for pain and for satisfaction, as well as ability to return to sport. Results: Overall, 90 female soccer players met the inclusion criteria, of whom 79% (41 BTB and 30 hamstring) were available for a minimum 2-year follow-up or had a graft failure before the follow-up. The BTB group had a lower body mass index (mean ± SD, 23 ± 3 vs 25 ± 4; P = .02) and shorter postoperative follow-up time in months (mean ± SD, 37.4 vs 46.1; P ≤ .001); otherwise, no differences in demographic, injury, or surgical variables between groups were noted. Regarding outcome measures, the BTB group achieved a higher Tegner score (6.0 vs 4.2; P = .004), and there was no other difference between groups. Of the patients who did not return to soccer, 44.7% reported fear as the reason. Of the patients who did return to soccer, 31.9% sustained another ACL injury (retear or contralateral tear), with no differences in reinjury rates based on graft selection. Conclusion: Adolescent female soccer players undergoing ACL reconstruction had relatively high satisfaction and outcome scores independent of autograft choice. Notwithstanding, patients and families need to be counseled that less than half of patients will return to their preinjury level of sport and, if an athlete attempts to return, there is a high risk of further ACL injury.