Calibrating gravitational-wave detectors with GW170817. (28th May 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Essick, Reed; Holz, Daniel E
• Is Part Of: Classical and quantum gravity. Volume 36:Number 12(2019:Jun.)
• Publication Date: 2019-05-28
• Subjects: gravitational waves -- calibration -- GW170817; Quantum gravity -- Periodicals; Gravitation -- Periodicals; Relativity (Physics) -- Periodicals; Space and time -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 521.1
• DOI: 10.1088/1361-6382/ab2142
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0264-9381

Abstract

Abstract: The waveform of a compact binary coalescence is predicted by general relativity. It is therefore possible to directly constrain the response of a gravitational-wave (GW) detector by analyzing a signal's observed amplitude and phase evolution as a function of frequency. GW signals alone constrain the relative amplitude and phase between different frequencies within the same detector and between different detectors. Furthermore, if the source's distance and inclination can be determined independently, for example from an electromagnetic (EM) counterpart, one can calibrate the absolute amplitude response of the detector network. We analyze GW170817's ability to calibrate the LIGO/Virgo detectors, finding a relative amplitude calibration precision of approximately 20% and relative phase precision of ( uncertainty) between the LIGO Hanford and Livingston detectors. Incorporating additional information about the distance and inclination of the source from EM observations, the relative amplitude of the LIGO detectors can be tightened to ̃ %. Including EM observations also constrains the absolute amplitude precision to similar levels. We investigate the ability of future events to improve astronomical calibration. By simulating the cumulative uncertainties from an ensemble of detections, we find that with several hundred events with EM counterparts, or several thousand events without counterparts, we reach percent-level astronomical calibration. This corresponds to ̃5–10 years of operation at advanced LIGO and Virgo design sensitivity. It is to be emphasized that direct in situ measurements of detector calibration provide significantly higher precision than astronomical sources, and already constrain the calibration to a few percent in amplitude and a few degrees in phase. In this sense, our astronomical calibrators only corroborate existing calibration measurements. Nonetheless, it is remarkable that we are able to use an astronomical GW source to characterize properties of a terrestrial GW instrument, and astrophysical calibration may become an important corroboration of existing calibration methods, providing a completely independent constraint of potential systematics.