Reliability of mismatch negativity event-related potentials in a multisite, traveling subjects study. Issue 12 (December 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Roach, Brian J.; Carrión, Ricardo E.; Hamilton, Holly K.; Bachman, Peter; Belger, Aysenil; Duncan, Erica; Johannesen, Jason; Light, Gregory A.; Niznikiewicz, Margaret; Addington, Jean; Bearden, Carrie E.; S.Cadenhead, Kristin; Cannon, Tyrone D.; A.Cornblatt, Barbara; McGlashan, Thomas H.; Perkins, Diana O.; Seidman, Larry; Tsuang, Ming; Walker, Elaine F.; Woods, Scott W.; Mathalon, Daniel H.
• Is Part Of: Clinical neurophysiology. Volume 131:Issue 12(2020:Dec.)
• Page Start: 2899
• Page End: 2909
• Publication Date: 2020-12
• Subjects: Event-Related Potentials (ERP) -- Mismatch Negativity (MMN) -- EEG -- Reliability -- Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) -- Psychosis; Neurophysiology -- Periodicals; Electroencephalography -- Periodicals; Electromyography -- Periodicals; Neurology -- Periodicals; 612.8
• DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.09.027
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1388-2457

Abstract

Highlights: The Mismatch Negativity (MMN) shows fair test, re-test reliability across 8 geographic testing sites. MMN reliability is greater using average mastoid than nose as the reference electrode. Multisite EEG studies of rare patient groups using MMN are feasible. Abstract: Objective: To determine the optimal methods for measuring mismatch negativity (MMN), an auditory event-related potential (ERP), and quantify sources of MMN variance in a multisite setting. Methods: Reliability of frequency, duration, and double (frequency + duration) MMN was determined from eight traveling subjects, tested on two occasions at eight laboratory sites. Deviant-specific variance components were estimated for MMN peak amplitude and latency measures using different ERP processing methods. Generalizability (G) coefficients were calculated using two-facet (site and occasion), fully-crossed models and single-facet (occasion) models within each laboratory to assess MMN reliability. Results: G-coefficients calculated from two-facet models indicated fair (0.4 < G<=0.6) duration MMN reliability at electrode Fz, but poor (G < 0.4) double and frequency MMN reliability. Single-facet G-coefficients averaged across laboratory resulted in improved reliability (G > 0.5). MMN amplitude reliability was greater than latency reliability, and reliability with mastoid referencing significantly outperformed nose-referencing. Conclusions: EEG preprocessing methods have an impact on the reliability of MMN amplitude. Within site MMN reliability can be excellent, consistent with prior single site studies. Significance: With standardized data collection and ERP processing, MMN can be reliably obtained in multisite studies, providing larger samples sizeswithin rare patient groups.