'Healing the institution': Conflict and democratic sovereignty in an Indigenous Community of the Argentine Chaco. Issue 117 (December 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Diz, Agustin
• Is Part Of: Geoforum. Issue 117(2020)
• Page Start: 173
• Page End: 182
• Publication Date: 2020-12
• Subjects: Latin America -- Community -- Representation -- Factionalism -- Recognition -- Governance; Geography -- Periodicals; Human geography -- Periodicals; Regional planning -- Periodicals; Sciences de la terre -- Périodiques; Géographie -- Périodiques; Géographie humaine -- Périodiques; Aménagement du territoire -- Périodiques; Earth sciences; Geography; Human geography; Regional planning; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 304.205
• DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.09.019
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0016-7185

Abstract

Highlights: Institutionalisation of Indigenous Communities is central to democratic governance. Government by community creates ambiguous space for recognition and empowerment. Centralised authority, representation and majoritarian rule transform local politics. Abstract: This article provides an ethnographic exploration of democratic sovereignty in an indigenous Guaraní settlement of Argentina's Gran Chaco. Focussing on legally instituted Indigenous Communities, it analyses political assemblies, elections, and bureaucracy as practices of self-government that mediate indigenous recognition and extend state authority. The article hones in on the 'social drama' of a particular settlement to show how extractive engagements combine with recognition to generate new forms of conflict. As state entities and officials mediate between Guaraní factions, institutionalisation advances, enfolding conflict and replicating state forms among local populations. This makes certain forms of political action legible, while rendering others opaque. By drawing attention to how indigenous leaders and state officials utilise opacity and legibility to further their own agendas I show how democratic institutions are co-produced through everyday interactions. The article argues that procedural efforts to incorporate and recognise indigenous societies through communal institutions have resulted in ambiguous forms of sovereignty. Shifting the emphasis away from multiculturalism to institutionalisation highlights the overlaps between indigenous and national forms of sovereignty and draws attention to the fact that many of the key political relations that structure indigenous recognition partake in broader mechanisms of democratic rule.